on 2024 Sep 06 10:24 AM
Hello everyone,
we are using the BAPI_NETWORK_MAINTAIN for massive changes. We have an issue that we can't solve: when the BAPI encounters an error, it stops and doesn’t provide evidence of all other errors nor does it indicate the operation that caused the error (message CJ280). However, from CJ20N we get a log with all the precise errors. If you execute the BAPI for each individual operation, you do get error details. Unfortunately, this second approach has worse performance, so we can’t use it.
Do you have any advice?
Thank's,
Vito
Hi Vito.
The BAPI_NETWORK_MAINTAIN requires the subsequent execution of the FM BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT. This BAPI tends to have messages when the first one (BAPI_NETWORK_MAINTAIN) does not return clear messages.
Have you tried retrieving the messages in the BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT?
Regards
Marcio Blos
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
91 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.