实际成本率计算没有按照分割结构设定的规则计算，分割结构不起作用

[Expert]

S/4 Cloud 专家      我们有MAC（对应非人工类成本要素）和LAB（对应人工类成本要素）两个作业类型，每个作业类型会有报工，且工时不一样。 执行了实际成本率的计算，发现Cloud里面把生产成本中心中的成本被平分为2部分对应到这两个作业类型， 而实际上LAB对应成本要素应占30%，MAC对应成本要素应占70%。 导致实际成本率非常不合理，没有分析意义，而且会导致后续物料账实际成本计算时相应物料的作业类型价差部分分摊严重偏移。      该问题的根本的原因应该是我们的直接生产成本中心并没有被分配到分配结构中（我们没有APP去配置，对应OP的Tcode是OKEW），导致实际成本费率没有按照分割结构。  请教一下SAP Cloud 专家， 针对上述的问题，SAP目前是什么解决方案，让客户接受不合理的实际成本费率，还是可以依据客户的需求通过专家配置方式把客户特定的直接生产成本中心分配到分割结构中？ 如果提专家申请方式，提Incident 应该选哪个组件？ 谢谢！

[Expert · Accepted solution]

不知是否仔细看了33Q的Best practice，在"2.5Preliminary Steps"有详细描述，是否有帮助？

Context

Splitting structure is used to split costs (belonging to cost centers) between activity types. Each splitting rule is based on a splitting method. In Cloud, the splitting method used is 12-Activity quantity. The splitting method indicates the way in which the costs are to be split.

You need to make sure that all the activity types relevant for actual rate calculation must be assigned to one of the activity type groups under YBMF_P00. We predeliver empty groups YBMF_P01 to YBMF_P08 with respective cost element groups of the same name. You can calculate different rates, for example, Labor and Machine by as-signing the respective activity and related GLs to different predelivered groups. The predelivered splitting structure is as shown in the following table and you can see that the groups are empty. You can use the Manage cost element groups app and Manage activity type groups app to add your activity and GL as per your business requirement.

Table 2: Splitting Structure YA

Assign-ment ‎#Element Group ‎@Type Group

YA2

[Expert]

This is a re-posted Q&A of an earlier question on this community"

[lemon-xue]

求问：最后解决是否能够正确处理 的，后续如何配置的