Object | Recommendation | Options | Potential Solution |
Company Codes | Recommended to keep 1:1 mapping. | N:1 mapping can be done | Case by case study needed as N:1 mapping is not support by SAP in certain cases |
Controlling Area | NA | Depends on Organizational Design | N:1 or 1:1 both choices are available |
Credit Control Area | NA | Depends on Organizational Design | N:1 or 1:1 both choices are available |
Ledger | This is mandatory in S/4HANA, even this is not in use in classic GL systems | Define Ledgers based on the requirements - Leading/Non-Leading | Conversion from Classic GL or Accounts based approach to ledger based is customization as SAP does not have any standard functionality |
Fiscal Year Variant | Recommended to keep same as in ECC | Change can be done via customization. Extensive testing needed | If its same FY then standard SAP approach is sufficient |
Country/Regions | Keep standard | Standard or Custom countries (if custom exists in ECC) | 1:1 mapping recommended |
Plants | NA | Depends on Organizational Design | N:1 or 1:1 both choices are available |
Sales Organization | If needed as part of reporting design or future architecture then should be taken case | CFIN mandatorily does not need this field for accounting/CO document replication | N:1 or 1:1 mapping supported. If not needed as part of design, this can be ignored |
Purchase Organization | If needed as part of reporting design or future architecture then should be taken case | CFIN mandatorily does not need this field for accounting/CO document replication | N:1 or 1:1 mapping supported. If not needed as part of design, this can be ignored |
Order Types (Cost Objects) | Choose Cost Object Cardinality based on future design (Cost Objects types and available mapping listed here -- >>) | · Product Cost Collector :PCC · Internal Order : IO · Prod Order to PCC · Quality Order :QM · Process Order to IO · Maintenance Order :MO · MO : Internal Order · WBS:WBS · Project: Project | Based on order category N:1 & 1:1 are support |
Business Area | Depends on usage | 1:1 Mapping N:1 Mapping or even ignore and clear the field | Segment/PC are better in terms of future design |
Credit Segment | Not needed for CFIN purposes | Customer Design | Customer Design leads |
Exchange Rate Types | Recommended to Harmonize | Mapping can be done | Customer Design leads |
Unit of Measure | Recommended to Harmonize | Mapping can be done | Customer Design leads |
Functional Area | Recommended to harmonize | N:1 or 1:1 Mapping | Most of the cases it is a derived field |
Tax Procedures | Mostly based on countries | 1:1 mapping | 1:1 Mapping |
House Bank | Harmonization Recommended | Not needed for CFIN purposes but needed for Central Payment | Customer Design leads |
Payment Method | Harmonization Recommended | Not needed for CFIN purposes but needed for Central Payment | Customer Design leads |
Payment Terms | Harmonization Recommended | Not needed for CFIN purposes but needed for Central Payment | Customer Design leads |
Company/Trading Partner | business Design and Intercompany processes leads | NA | Customer Design leads |
Document Type | Recommended to move to Standard document types | 1:1 or N:1 Mapping | Mappings |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
9 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |