Enterprise Resource Planning Blogs by Members
Gain new perspectives and knowledge about enterprise resource planning in blog posts from community members. Share your own comments and ERP insights today!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
nitin_gupta10
Active Participant
3,204


Wherever an organization thinks about SAP Central Finance first topic which pops up is data harmonization as SAP Central Finance given an opportunity to harmonize the data which is not done in legacy or due to the fact that legacy is based on M&A the data is segregated.

There are TWO components of Data Harmonization:


In this blog the focus is on Configuration Data. Lets look at the list first which comprises of configuration data:

  • Company Codes

  • Controlling area

  • Credit Control Area

  • Ledger

  • Fiscal Year Variant

  • Country/Region

  • Plants

  • Sales Organization

  • Purchase Organization

  • Payment Method

  • Payment Terms

  • House Bank

  • Order Types

  • Business Area

  • Credit Segment

  • Unit of Measure

  • Exchange Rate Types

  • Tax Procedures

  • Functional Area

  • Company/Trading Partner

  • Document Types

  • Many more...


Now let’s see how these can be managed.

Please note that the information provided here is based on experience from CFIN projects. There is no right or wrong as the design decisions are organization/projects specific.

 







































































































































Object Recommendation Options Potential Solution
Company Codes Recommended to keep 1:1 mapping. N:1 mapping can be done Case by case study needed as N:1 mapping is not support by SAP in certain cases
Controlling Area NA Depends on Organizational Design N:1 or 1:1 both choices are available
Credit Control Area NA Depends on Organizational Design N:1 or 1:1 both choices are available
Ledger This is mandatory in S/4HANA, even this is not in use in classic GL systems Define Ledgers based on the requirements  - Leading/Non-Leading Conversion from Classic GL or Accounts based approach to ledger based is customization as SAP does not have any standard functionality
Fiscal Year Variant Recommended to keep same as in ECC Change can be done via customization. Extensive testing needed If its same FY then standard SAP approach is sufficient
Country/Regions Keep standard Standard or Custom countries (if custom exists in ECC) 1:1 mapping recommended
Plants NA Depends on Organizational Design N:1 or 1:1 both choices are available
Sales Organization If needed as part of reporting design or future architecture then should be taken case CFIN mandatorily does not need this field for accounting/CO document replication N:1 or 1:1 mapping supported. If not needed as part of design, this can be ignored
Purchase Organization If needed as part of reporting design or future architecture then should be taken case CFIN mandatorily does not need this field for accounting/CO document replication N:1 or 1:1 mapping supported. If not needed as part of design, this can be ignored
Order Types (Cost Objects)

Choose Cost Object Cardinality based on future design

(Cost Objects types and available mapping listed here -- >>)


·         Product Cost Collector :PCC

·         Internal Order : IO

·         Prod Order to PCC

·         Quality Order :QM

·         Process Order to IO

·         Maintenance Order :MO

·         MO : Internal Order

·         WBS:WBS

·         Project: Project
Based on order category N:1 & 1:1 are support
Business Area Depends on usage

1:1 Mapping

N:1 Mapping or even ignore and clear the field
Segment/PC are better in terms of future design
Credit Segment Not needed for CFIN purposes Customer Design Customer Design leads
Exchange Rate Types Recommended to Harmonize Mapping can be done Customer Design leads
Unit of Measure Recommended to Harmonize Mapping can be done Customer Design leads
Functional Area Recommended to harmonize N:1 or 1:1 Mapping Most of the cases it is a derived field
Tax Procedures Mostly based on countries 1:1 mapping 1:1 Mapping
House Bank Harmonization Recommended Not needed for CFIN purposes but needed for Central Payment Customer Design leads
Payment Method Harmonization Recommended Not needed for CFIN purposes but needed for Central Payment Customer Design leads
Payment Terms Harmonization Recommended Not needed for CFIN purposes but needed for Central Payment Customer Design leads
Company/Trading Partner business Design and Intercompany processes leads NA Customer Design leads
Document Type Recommended to move to Standard document types 1:1 or N:1 Mapping Mappings

Their are several more objects which are not immediately important to think about like:

  1. Order Groups

  2. Cost Element Groups

  3. Financial Statement Version 

  4. Controlling Version

  5. Cost Center Attributes

  6. Project Type


In my next blogs i will talk about master data objects.

Keep reading and share your challenges related to CFIN Implementations...

 

 
Labels in this area