The type of "LS_DATA_EXTRACT-WA_LINE_ITEMS" cannot be converted to the" type of "LS_DATA-WA_LINE_ITEMS"."

[Former Member]

Hi all,

I am getting dump after upgrade ,please find attached file.

there are two different structures as below,

    ls_data_extract type idmx_di_ori_in_msg_type, - deep structure

    ls_line_items    type idmx_di_line_items_typ, - normal structure

Due to system upgrade this issue has been raised .

but now i am not having any kind of solution for the same as how to remove this dump .

After execution of function module 'IDMX_DI_FI_SIGN' we can get another function module ' IDMX_DI_FI_SINGLE_SIGN' inthis function module they have declared ,

    ls_data_extract type idmx_di_ori_in_msg_type,

    ls_line_items type idmx_di_line_items_typ,

The following syntax error occurred in program "SAPLIDMX_DI_SIGNATURE " in

include "LIDMX_DI_SIGNATUREU12 " in

line 202:

"The type of "LS_DATA_EXTRACT-WA_LINE_ITEMS" cannot be converted to the"

" type of "LS_DATA-WA_LINE_ITEMS"."

please help me to remove this dump as we are not having test cases for the same as this issue raise after Support Pack upgrade.

Thanks and Regards,

PKN.

[roberto_vacca2]

Hi.

There are no so many choices. It's a standard function module IDMX_DI_SD_SINGLE_SIGN.

Support Package Upgrade usually list their content notes. You should identify notes related to IDMX_DI_SD_SINGLE_SIGN and try to implement and de-implement single notes.

If you have this kind of problem is because something is not allined in your system or you need any notes to be applied.

Only rarely it is necessary to copy old code and replace it directly in standard program with a "standard change key request".

Hope to help ...

Bye

[Jelena_Perfiljeva]

It's a standard SAP object, so I'm confused - why are you posting this on SCN instead of opening an incident with SAP?

[roberto_vacca2]

Hi.

Well because probably sap , as other times happend to me , would reply him that is a standard behaviour and that's a problem only for him... as in the politics when you need politician solve a problem for people

[Jelena_Perfiljeva]

This might as well be the case (although I've never got such response for a syntax error), but still it seems like a good starting point.