2015 Dec 21 5:24 AM
As i am converting the standard Function Module to Remote Function Module (CREDIT_EXPOSURE) it is not asking any access key !!
i am on right path !!
2015 Dec 21 5:43 AM
Hi,
It just means someone has already opened the object with the access key before you.
Thanks & regards,
Monami.
2015 Dec 21 5:55 AM
Hi monami,
Thanks for reply ,
but i am the only one who is changing it sure you can believe me.
Thanks & Regards,
K.Manoj
2015 Dec 21 7:01 AM
Hi Manoj,
Please check if you have a developer key entry in table DEVACCESS for the user ID. When the key is present, it means that a developer key was provided earlier for the user ID.
Hope this helps,
~Athreya
2015 Dec 21 7:18 AM
Hi Rama Krishna,
Yes developer key is provided is in the table DEVACCESS, if it is not provided we can not do developments ...that is for developer key only
Is that key will provide us access to change the Standard object ....!!!
but if i try to change other objects it is asking access key ..!!!
Thanks & Regards,
K.Manoj
2015 Dec 21 8:05 AM
Hi Manoj,
My earlier reply some how has got truncated while posting. DEVACCESS table holds the developer key for a user ID and ADIRACCESS table holds the access key data for a particular object. If there is an entry in this table for the function module, it means that at some point the FM was edited and access key was provided.
Hope it helps,
~Athreya
2015 Dec 21 9:15 AM
If you are coinverting an FM because you now have a requirement for it to be RFC enabled, don't touch the SAP standard - write a wrapper around it that is RFC enabled and call the standard module within that.
Regards
Rich
2015 Dec 21 10:39 AM
2015 Dec 21 10:44 AM
2015 Dec 21 1:31 PM
2015 Dec 21 2:02 PM
2015 Dec 21 11:08 AM
Check at https://service.sap.com/sap/bc/bsp/spn/sscr/intro.htm for your company registration.
(or ask your admin to do)
As an alternative look in table ADIRACCESS for the function group (R3TR FUGR) containing the FM (as suggested in second anwer of Athreya)
I confirm using a wrapper is good practice, when changing standard is not.
Regards,
Raymond