Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Biller direct EVENT_0110_TOTAL form in LFKK_EBPPFE0 include has incorrect logic?

kavmp
Participant
0 Kudos
355

When posting a payment in biller direct where the partner has one active contract account and one inactive contract account, t_invoices_paydata is not empty. Whereas selection table t_seltab[] is appended with contract account selection items only when the t_invoices_paydata[] is empty. As the CA details are not in t_seltab, and only parnter details are there, the payment is getting posted to inactive contract account. so this condition where the code checks for sy-tfill Eq 0 for t_invoices_paydata must be removed.

Can you pls check the code and tell me if my analysis is right?

4 REPLIES 4

Sandra_Rossi
Active Contributor
0 Kudos
298

I guess this question demonstrates the XY problem - Wikipedia.

You'd better explain functionally and ask non-ABAP people (they may possibly know ABAP but it wouldn't be relevant).

kavmp
Participant
298

I was asked to look into this issue from abap side from the functional resources. I think this might lead to an SAP OSS proceeding further. But wanted to check in the forum if my conclusion was sensible. thanks!

Sandra_Rossi
Active Contributor
0 Kudos
298

Okay. You should tell your "functional resources" to first ask the question to the SAP community functional resources.

kavmp
Participant
0 Kudos
298

It is a standard code issue but as the FM in question is not released, we have to proceed with customization of fqevents I guess. Thanks for your reply.