Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

XD01 - Making Dunning field required

mattnewell
Explorer
0 Kudos
1,156

I know that I can add code to EXIT_SAPMF02D_001 for this, but is there an easier way to make the dunning procedure field on XD01 a required field? Thanks

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Read only

Former Member
0 Kudos
511

You can do this via SPRO. Here is the path:

Financial Accounting>Account Rec and Payables>Customer Accounts>Master Data>Preparation for creating Customer Master Data-->Define Account Groups with Screen Layouts (Customers).

Select the Account Group and Click details button. In the Field Status section, select Company Code Data and hit the Edit Field Status button. Double Click Correspondence. You would find Dunning Data there as an option with various radio button. Click the Req. Entry radi button to make it mandatory. Save and test.

Hope this helps!

4 REPLIES 4
Read only

Former Member
0 Kudos
511

use transaction variants .

transaction code is shd0.

Read only

0 Kudos
511

going with user-exit(or badi) is good practice than transaction variant.

thanq

Read only

Former Member
0 Kudos
512

You can do this via SPRO. Here is the path:

Financial Accounting>Account Rec and Payables>Customer Accounts>Master Data>Preparation for creating Customer Master Data-->Define Account Groups with Screen Layouts (Customers).

Select the Account Group and Click details button. In the Field Status section, select Company Code Data and hit the Edit Field Status button. Double Click Correspondence. You would find Dunning Data there as an option with various radio button. Click the Req. Entry radi button to make it mandatory. Save and test.

Hope this helps!

Read only

mattnewell
Explorer
0 Kudos
511

Thanks all, the config steps seemed to fix our issue. The functional area did not see this previously.