2012 Sep 11 1:59 PM
Hi all,
I appended four fields to MARA and MARC and maintain them in two extra tabs in MM01, mm02 and mm03. The fields get changed and saved as they should. So far so good. But now I need to make four custom fields available for mass maintenance (MASS and/or MM17). I have come far but not to the finish. I did:
- Used transaction OMSR to make fields appear in MM17 -> BUS1001 -> field-selection-list
- Tx WE31: Extended idoc-extension Z_MARAM with segment Z1INKWM which contains the fields ZZGOGIGRP, ZZGO_COUNTRY and ZZZIPCODE
- Tx WE31: Created Idoc-segment ZE1MARCM and added field ZZDELIVERYGROUP
- used enhancement MGV00001 with customer exit EXIT_SAPLMV01_002 for creating the IDocs and customer exit EXIT_SAPLMV02_002 for posting the IDocs
Strange thing: it works for only one field: ZZGOGIGROUP. All of them are present in T130F, but in MASS when you can select the field for mass-change, only ZZGOGIGROUP and ZZDELIVERYGROUP are there.
And only ZZGOGIGROUP stores its data when the mass-change is executed.
Any uideas where to look?
Best regards,
Tim van Steenbergen
2012 Sep 11 2:17 PM
Hi Tim,
Please check the below links. See if it helps.
<removed by moderator>
Regards,
Rudra
Moderator message: no link farms please, reply with specific information only.
Message was edited by: Thomas Zloch
2012 Sep 11 3:10 PM
Pitty that the link is removed.
Meanwhile I have seen another link (will not mention it here since it is not allowed) and it described the steps to take.
So far I ran Tx MASSOBJ and now all four fields in MASS are showing up in the fieldlist. 🙂
Checking if the mass-changes get stored correctly....
Partial succes: the 3 MARA-fields get stored now, the MARC-ZZDELIVERY not.
To solve that: How can I, when I save the changes in MASS, debug the FM EXIT_SAPLMV02_002 to see what goes wrong?
2012 Sep 11 3:17 PM
Hi Tim,
I am afraid that's the way it works. For this case it will be very difficult for anybody to give any specific answer without log in to the system. In my case what I did was used Idoc Matmas in combination of LSMW once and BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEREPLICA once. Both of them worked perfectly fine. I wish I could help you further but will be not be poaasible without seeing the system. I agree with you. Debugging would be good option.
Regards
R
2012 Sep 11 2:42 PM
I suppose you already have applied procedure of Note 44410 - Integrating cust.-specific fields in matl master and are now applying those of Note 576160 - MM17: BAdI implementation for append fields.
Correct me if wrong, else check if you have correctly followed the procedure of the notes. What is your SAP version, for old versions did you look for available notes ?
Regards,
Raymond
2012 Sep 11 3:22 PM
Hi Raymond, yes i have. Sorry for not mentioning that upfront. 576160 does mention what needs to be done. Also i have red 1024725. Thanks