Bug: AdT Quick-Fix "create local interface" - strange choice of target source position

[joachimrees1]

This seems wrong:

I'm using the "create local interface"-quick fix:

It does create the wanted code, but at a very strange position:

-> code is create right in between the "IMPL" and "MENTATION" , smash face into the Statement:

class lcl_report IMPLEMENTATION

...this results in some Syntax-Errors.

...it should be created e.g. at the start of the source file, I guess. ?!

[joachimrees1]

Also, next I created a Class, again via quick fix: it ended up right after the CL of "CLASS"?!

[joachimrees1]

Sidenote: I was going to write between "CL and $restOfTheWord " , kind of expecting it getting censored - but it was that nothing happen after hitting the submit button (no message about "using bad words" ) or anything, just the comment not beeing posted.

[UweFetzer_se38]

I don't know the answer, but please may I ask a question? Why you are using INCLUDES?

(and maybe not only me but also the quickfix has problems with INCLUDES)

[foessleitner]

Please try this in a "real" development / class. Then it should and will work. - An local interface in a include does not make sense from my perspective.

[matt]

I used to put classes local to a report program into separate includes for organisation purposes. But with ADT outline, I find it better to not.

[michael_gutfleisch]

Hi Joachim,

even if it might not be a typical use case, it should still generate valid code. Could you please open a ticket to get this fixed?

Regards,
Michael