2024 Aug 06 9:06 AM - edited 2024 Aug 06 9:43 AM
Hello Everyone,
I have a question regarding BOMMAT version 6. I am using Bill of Materials iDoc to replicate BOM to my system. When I am creating mapping in iFlow, I figure out that header name "E1STKOM" is present in all version of BOMMAT (00 to 09) Except BOMMAT06. In BOMMAT06 the header name is "E1STKON" which is generally used for BOMORD and not BOMMAT. Does anyone know why its only diffrent in this version ? Or any link for the releases of version with SAP Note?
Used TCode: we60, cs01, bd10
Thanks in advance !!
ABAP Development #Bill_of_Materials
2024 Aug 06 9:33 AM
You are an SAP employee, so no excuse 😉 to not check in the SAP notes (nothing related to BOMMAT06).
Please embed the screenshot instead of attaching the image.
The predecessor of BOMMAT07 (release 7.52) is BOMMAT05 (release 7.51), not BOMMAT06.
2024 Aug 06 9:42 AM
Thanks @Sandra_Rossi ,
Using which TCode, do you get such info? And add on question, our customer is using all BOMMAT Version which we have to support, so when I am mapping the fields its same for all version and not only BOMMAT06. I tried to find the SAP Note but so far no luck. No idea, if I need to do a different mapping than only for this version? And if I do so what about the updates?
Could only find one bug which is partially relevent : https://me.sap.com/notes/577493/E where it says this header is for BOMORD but then why its in BOMMAT.
2024 Aug 06 1:27 PM
TCode WE30 > IDoc type BOMMAT07 > Button "Header".
Or table EDBAS IDOCTYP / RELEASED / PRETYP:
There are no SAP notes about BOMMAT06.
Why do you think there's a bug? It's a bug only for your tool, not for SAP. Just make your tool deal with such exceptions and that's it.
2024 Aug 06 1:31 PM
@Sandra_Rossi Yes you are right ! I will correct my mappings according to BOMMAT version. Initially I had idea of only this version but after your first response I could find that info and saw that version 6 is derived from version 2 which has same headers. So as you said its not a bug and we have to correct it to our end. Thanks for your help 🙂