<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BRF+ Dunning - Switching back to Dunning Procedure-based Dunning in SAP for Utilities Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/sap-for-utilities-discussions/brf-dunning-switching-back-to-dunning-procedure-based-dunning/m-p/11519362#M27299</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Bill. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, reverting would entail deactivating the related Business Functions? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please confirm. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and regards, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ivor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ivor_martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-03T14:56:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BRF+ Dunning - Switching back to Dunning Procedure-based Dunning</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/sap-for-utilities-discussions/brf-dunning-switching-back-to-dunning-procedure-based-dunning/m-p/11519360#M27297</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Colleagues, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are implementing BRF+ IS-U Collection Strategy Dunning. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once we turn on the Business Function for Flexible Dunning and assign the Master Data Grouping level (e.g. at&amp;nbsp; Contract Account level), can we revert back to the traditional Dunning Procedure-based Dunning?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If so, would it be a Basis task to turn off Flexible Dunning (in addition to blanking out the Master Data Grouping level at Company Code level)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your feedback would be appreciated. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and regards, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ivor Martin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:15:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/sap-for-utilities-discussions/brf-dunning-switching-back-to-dunning-procedure-based-dunning/m-p/11519360#M27297</guid>
      <dc:creator>ivor_martin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-02T16:15:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BRF+ Dunning - Switching back to Dunning Procedure-based Dunning</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/sap-for-utilities-discussions/brf-dunning-switching-back-to-dunning-procedure-based-dunning/m-p/11519361#M27298</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ivor:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would be able to switch back however you would encounter challenges as far as determining last action.&amp;nbsp; Dunning procedure only looks at dunning levels achieved, in the same way that collection strategy only looks at collection steps executed.&amp;nbsp; I dont think that the grouping or the strategy values need to be changed, since the dunning procedure would not care about them.&amp;nbsp; Technically it is not difficult to revert - it would be a bigger issue from a business and process point of view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;bill.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/sap-for-utilities-discussions/brf-dunning-switching-back-to-dunning-procedure-based-dunning/m-p/11519361#M27298</guid>
      <dc:creator>william_eastman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-03T14:51:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BRF+ Dunning - Switching back to Dunning Procedure-based Dunning</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/sap-for-utilities-discussions/brf-dunning-switching-back-to-dunning-procedure-based-dunning/m-p/11519362#M27299</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Bill. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, reverting would entail deactivating the related Business Functions? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please confirm. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and regards, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ivor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/sap-for-utilities-discussions/brf-dunning-switching-back-to-dunning-procedure-based-dunning/m-p/11519362#M27299</guid>
      <dc:creator>ivor_martin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-03T14:56:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BRF+ Dunning - Switching back to Dunning Procedure-based Dunning</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/sap-for-utilities-discussions/brf-dunning-switching-back-to-dunning-procedure-based-dunning/m-p/11519363#M27300</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;no - just changing the company code setting in TFK001B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:05:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/sap-for-utilities-discussions/brf-dunning-switching-back-to-dunning-procedure-based-dunning/m-p/11519363#M27300</guid>
      <dc:creator>william_eastman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-03T15:05:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

