<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Question Re: Attributes VS Fields in Technology Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/attributes-vs-fields/qaa-p/1566916#M686135</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Jack:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure, attributes are special for specific characteristics. If your particular case I would recommend actually using a qualified table multivalued, where you can store the registers of type "Seat" and then add them to the main table (automobiles).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope that helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alejandro&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:03:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-10-09T04:03:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Attributes VS Fields</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/attributes-vs-fields/qaq-p/1566915</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear MDM gurus,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One question on Category-attributes vs Fields....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;say I have a category like automobiles ---&amp;gt; below that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&amp;gt; sedans &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---&amp;gt; SUV etc at the sidling level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now if sedan has 4 seats and SUV has 7 seats.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do we capture the 3 extra seats of SUV.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should it be attributes ? If so how can I capture the details behuind each of the 3 extra seats like "mad of ..e.g. leather,cloth,wool",dimensions,features( child lock available).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your inputs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jack&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:42:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/attributes-vs-fields/qaq-p/1566915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-08T16:42:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Attributes VS Fields</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/attributes-vs-fields/qaa-p/1566916#M686135</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Jack:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure, attributes are special for specific characteristics. If your particular case I would recommend actually using a qualified table multivalued, where you can store the registers of type "Seat" and then add them to the main table (automobiles).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope that helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alejandro&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:03:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/attributes-vs-fields/qaa-p/1566916#M686135</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-09T04:03:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Attributes VS Fields</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/attributes-vs-fields/qaa-p/1566917#M686136</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also I would like to add the fundamental difference between Attributes and fields...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In MDM, an attribute is like a field, but one that applies only to a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;subset of the records in a table. By contrast, a field is part of every&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;record in a table. If a particular attribute can be applied to every product&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in a repository, then it should be set up as a field in the main table. For&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;example, every product in a repository probably has an item number;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;therefore &amp;#147;Item Number&amp;#148; should be defined in the database as a field,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and not as an attribute.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tanveer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Please mark helpful answers&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:28:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/attributes-vs-fields/qaa-p/1566917#M686136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-09T04:28:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Attributes VS Fields</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/attributes-vs-fields/qaa-p/1566918#M686137</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Tanveer,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but when you are use a Catalog for Products with taxonomies, the categories in the taxonomy can be very dynamic. Once you create a new Category which should not have this common attribute/field your repository will still provide the field to products from the new category.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;@Alejandro. The example "Automibles" looks like an example for a taxonomy with attributes. So if you create multivalued qualified lookup table you don't have the possibility for taxonomy search anymore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;@Jack. You could define "Seat" as an Text attribute with thze two predefined values 4 and 7. So the user can choose between both values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nicolas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:11:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/attributes-vs-fields/qaa-p/1566918#M686137</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-10T17:11:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

