<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Question Re: Object Development for Side by side Extension in Technology Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/object-development-for-side-by-side-extension/qaa-p/14022357#M4904291</link>
    <description>Wrong tag: question not related to "SAP Business One Extensibility", which is related to "SAP Business One". Question is about S/4. "SAP Business One" is its own SAP product, which has nothing to do with S/4 or ABAP.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:36:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Johan_Hakkesteegt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-20T09:36:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Object Development for Side by side Extension</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/object-development-for-side-by-side-extension/qaq-p/14022077</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as I know , there are plenty of extensibility types for SAP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, in-app extensibility and side-by-side extensibility.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://sapzero2hero.com/2023/09/19/sap-s-4hana-cloud-developer-extensibility-in-s-4-hana-cloud/" target="_blank"&gt;https://sapzero2hero.com/2023/09/19/sap-s-4hana-cloud-developer-extensibility-in-s-4-hana-cloud/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Before side-by-side extensibility showed up, we used RICEFW to kind of categorize the objects needed for development.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when it comes to side by side extension, does the same categories apply?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For me, side by side extensibility (using BTP) is like a totally different world compared to extension within S4.&lt;BR /&gt;How do you usually categorize the objects needed for development in this case?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wei-Hsin, Kuo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 05:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/object-development-for-side-by-side-extension/qaq-p/14022077</guid>
      <dc:creator>shin861231</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-20T05:26:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object Development for Side by side Extension</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/object-development-for-side-by-side-extension/qaa-p/14022304#M4904284</link>
      <description>The "E" of RICEFW is for enhancement/extension, so you can use this acronym. But even RICEFW in the old time could be not precise enough.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 08:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/object-development-for-side-by-side-extension/qaa-p/14022304#M4904284</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sandra_Rossi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-20T08:50:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object Development for Side by side Extension</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/object-development-for-side-by-side-extension/qaa-p/14022357#M4904291</link>
      <description>Wrong tag: question not related to "SAP Business One Extensibility", which is related to "SAP Business One". Question is about S/4. "SAP Business One" is its own SAP product, which has nothing to do with S/4 or ABAP.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:36:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/object-development-for-side-by-side-extension/qaa-p/14022357#M4904291</guid>
      <dc:creator>Johan_Hakkesteegt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-20T09:36:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

