<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Question Re: Patching Cycles in Technology Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687531#M3897635</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ian Daniel wrote:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;How is anyone else coping with this, and do you have any thoughts?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ian,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO it depends on what issues you're having with the current patch level and which patch is supposed to fix them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards, Tero&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:04:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>terovirta</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-11-04T08:04:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Patching Cycles</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaq-p/10687529</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've been having a debate with SAP about the frequency of update required to maintain support. There has been an OSS note issued regarding this which is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2051068"&gt;http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2051068&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It basically states that code corrections will only be released on the latest support package:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"Therefore, prerequisite for a patch to successfully resolve a customer issue is that the IdM installation has been updated to the latest delivered SP of Identity Management 7.2."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #000000; font-size: 16px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;As the updates by SAP are produced twice a year, this forces customers to patch twice a year to maintain support. Not only that, but you must patch &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;quickly after each patch is released. As a customer, we thought we were doing a good job patching once a year, but now, depending on our patching cycles we can be out of date within weeks of us finishing our patching. This problem will ease when 7.2 becomes a second class citizen in terms of patching once IdM 8 is released, but for the moment, this is causing us pain.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;How is anyone else coping with this, and do you have any thoughts?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Cheers,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;Ian&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #000000; font-size: 16px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaq-p/10687529</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-03T15:15:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patching Cycles</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687530#M3897634</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Lan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For patching once a year or twice a year its doesn't make matter. SAP will suggest for any patch update based of their new functionality or pervious bug fixing. It is good to update the patch if SAP recommended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is what I'm understand.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brindavan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687530#M3897634</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brindavan_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-03T15:25:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patching Cycles</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687531#M3897635</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ian Daniel wrote:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;How is anyone else coping with this, and do you have any thoughts?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="color: #000000; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ian,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO it depends on what issues you're having with the current patch level and which patch is supposed to fix them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards, Tero&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:04:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687531#M3897635</guid>
      <dc:creator>terovirta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-04T08:04:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patching Cycles</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687532#M3897636</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pretty much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't patch if I don't have to, because in my experience with each new patch MIGHT come solutions for current issues, but very surely new issues are guaranteed. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="sad" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.sap.com/1078/images/emoticons/sad.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; Most "fun" with my IDM I have after an update. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steffi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687532#M3897636</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steffi_Warnecke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-04T10:02:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patching Cycles</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687533#M3897637</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ISteffi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="sad"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt; Most "fun" with my IDM I have after an update. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Historically this has always been the case with IDM.&amp;nbsp; However, to be fair, I think this could be said about most big enterprise applications. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.sap.com/1078/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt; (count on Delta and Import/Export to be the parts of IDM to most likely to be affected)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Former Member, Are you referring to SPs or new versions?&amp;nbsp; As others have said, it all depends on what the new release brings.&amp;nbsp; I'll almost always advocate SP updates, but I think the thing you need to do is read the relevant notes and see how it works for your organization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687533#M3897637</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member2987</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-04T14:13:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patching Cycles</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687534#M3897638</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;Historically this has always been the case with IDM.&amp;nbsp; However, to be fair, I think this could be said about most big enterprise applications. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; (count on Delta and Import/Export to be the parts of IDM to most likely to be affected) &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Absolutly. I could have put "Portal" there instead and it would be the same answer. ^^&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:28:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687534#M3897638</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steffi_Warnecke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-04T14:28:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patching Cycles</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687535#M3897639</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pretty much. We don't have IdM, so I can't speak to that, but we &lt;EM&gt;rarely&lt;/EM&gt; patch our Portal, because it's such a hassle reintegrating customizations, and it's so much more labor- and time-intensive than ABAP support packs. Even on the ABAP side, we have to drag our business units kicking and screaming into agreement with applying support packs once a year to maintain tax and legal compliance, and even then, they typically won't go along with patching the whole system unless it's required to support the legal compliance. The conversation goes like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basis: "We need to apply Support Packs."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Business: "No."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Functional Analysts: "What's the minimum we can get away with?"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basis: "We need to do it or we'll lose support."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Management: "Can we purchase extended maintenance?"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basis: "We already did that."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everyone: "Oh."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:48:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687535#M3897639</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matt_Fraser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-04T15:48:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Patching Cycles</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687536#M3897640</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the helpful feedback, it looks like this is still an open question within the community to get some more positive answers from SAP regarding support as more and more customers have older versions of IdM being deployed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:20:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/patching-cycles/qaa-p/10687536#M3897640</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-10T10:20:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

