<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Question Re: LV61A081 LV61A082 - pricing date vs billing date in Enterprise Resource Planning Q&amp;A</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/lv61a081-lv61a082-pricing-date-vs-billing-date/qaa-p/14044922#M4210773</link>
    <description>&lt;P class="lia-align-justify"&gt;SAP note 1256361 should address this issue for sure.&amp;nbsp; In case, you still have an issue, ensure, the routines 82 &amp;amp; 333 are set as per SAP note 2555008.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-align-justify"&gt;With all these settings, still, it is not working, then, before going for any custom validation, raise a ticket with SAP by referring note 1256361 has not solved your issue.&amp;nbsp; They will guide you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:21:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lakshmipathi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-14T15:21:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LV61A081 LV61A082 - pricing date vs billing date</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/lv61a081-lv61a082-pricing-date-vs-billing-date/qaq-p/14043447</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Collegue&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have had a argentine customer claim for a customer invoice because it has wrong calculation of J1X1 Perception and J1A1 Perception.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;We have checked the cause: the requirements 81 and 82 where not fullfilled because the customer master tax grouping records ( table knat)&amp;nbsp;was checked against the pricing date ( komk-prsdt) instead of the billing date ( komk-fkdat)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact , we have found note 1747589 - 1256361 that applies a correction to formula 333 for using billing date instead of pricing date, but&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;we have not found any note to be applied related to requirements 81 and 82 for correcting the way it access to table knat using billing date .&lt;BR /&gt;We attached the abap code for routines &amp;nbsp;81 and 82 were it is used the pricing date ( komk-prsdt) for table knat. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aditionally, J1X1 and J1A1 conditions are set as pricing date = billing date &amp;nbsp;in the sap standard ( T685A-KPRDT = C = billing date )&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Someone had had the same problem? Did you find a solution with a SAP oss note?&lt;BR /&gt;We are willing to avoid to&amp;nbsp; copy the requeriments 81 and 82 to a custom solution to use billing date instead of pricing date , if there is a note to be applied.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also we find that in these routines it is not check standard localization table&amp;nbsp;j_1at001tc where it is defined if the perception is active por the company code.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems argentine localization requirements 81 and 82 are not as far as complete ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your imputs&lt;BR /&gt;Viviana&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;routine 81 - program LV61A081&lt;BR /&gt;* check if date is in the subjected interval and therefore valid&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; if knat-sbjdf le komk-prsdt and&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;knat-sbjdt ge komk-prsdt.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;lv_subrc = 0.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; endif.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;routine 82 - program LV61A082&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;check if date is in the subjected interval and therefore valid&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; if knat-sbjdf le komk-prsdt and&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;knat-sbjdt ge komk-prsdt.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; lv_subrc = 0.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:54:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/lv61a081-lv61a082-pricing-date-vs-billing-date/qaq-p/14043447</guid>
      <dc:creator>ViviStagno</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-13T17:54:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LV61A081 LV61A082 - pricing date vs billing date</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/lv61a081-lv61a082-pricing-date-vs-billing-date/qaa-p/14044922#M4210773</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="lia-align-justify"&gt;SAP note 1256361 should address this issue for sure.&amp;nbsp; In case, you still have an issue, ensure, the routines 82 &amp;amp; 333 are set as per SAP note 2555008.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-align-justify"&gt;With all these settings, still, it is not working, then, before going for any custom validation, raise a ticket with SAP by referring note 1256361 has not solved your issue.&amp;nbsp; They will guide you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:21:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/lv61a081-lv61a082-pricing-date-vs-billing-date/qaa-p/14044922#M4210773</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lakshmipathi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-14T15:21:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

