<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SO01 Vs SBWP in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131236#M987851</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;THanks all for the help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:14:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-05T15:14:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SO01 Vs SBWP</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131230#M987845</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently received a request to have SO01 added to our general user role. I would like to know the implication this may have if assigned to all users. Also, what is the difference between SO01 and SBWP. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A reply would be much appreciated. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:05:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131230#M987845</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-09T20:05:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SO01 Vs SBWP</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131231#M987846</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;both transactions are 'the same'.  I believe that SO01 is inherited from when the business workplace was still called SAP Office or something like that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:38:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131231#M987846</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member74904</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-10T07:38:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SO01 Vs SBWP</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131232#M987847</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both transactions "look the same", but there are differences:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- SO01 checks object S_OC_TCD field TCD id 'SO01' at transaction start, however SBWP does not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The program uses SY-TCODE cases to determine which function modules are used, and these are technically different objects.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;MSSO0F01
....
  CASE SY-TCODE.
*  case l_tcode.
    when 'SBWP'.
*     common view of business workplace
      call function 'SINWP_WORKPLACE_CREATE'.
.....
    when 'SO01X'.
*     Inbox classic
      call function 'SIN_OBJECT_LIST_SHOW'
           exporting
                folder_region = in_fol
                folder_id     = inbox_id
                owner         = owner.&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:03:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131232#M987847</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-10T09:03:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SO01 Vs SBWP</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131233#M987848</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would any one recommend giving access to both t/codes to all users?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:15:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131233#M987848</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-29T15:15:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SO01 Vs SBWP</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131234#M987849</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Would any one recommend giving access to both t/codes to all users?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can we know which is better for the specific purpose they have in mind? Did they give you an explanation for &lt;STRONG&gt;why&lt;/STRONG&gt; they were requesting both transactions, although they &lt;EM&gt;appear&lt;/EM&gt; at first to be functionally the same?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of interest for you might be that SBWP has been maintained and patched until recently and is included in the Standard Easy Access Menu. A good sign.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The SO01 related function has not been touched in any visible way (to me) since 1998... 10 years ago. A bad sign. The SO0X functions (function group SIN1) are also remote-enabled...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are some other aspects as well...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The important thing is to ask them &lt;STRONG&gt;why&lt;/STRONG&gt; they want access to this old functionality when there is newer functionality. That is generally good to do anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps with some ideas,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131234#M987849</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-29T17:16:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SO01 Vs SBWP</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131235#M987850</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also had faced such a request recently. Although users had SBWP they were requesting SO01.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Analyzing the reason for the requst, i found that when users have a mail in their SAP inbox and they try to login to the SAP System, a popup comes informing them regarding a new mail arrival in their SAP inbox and when they say OK to it, it calls SO01 transaction code !!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I gave them a workaround to check the mail from SBWP, however its kina wired.... popup should have called SBWP instead !!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131235#M987850</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-29T18:23:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SO01 Vs SBWP</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131236#M987851</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;THanks all for the help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:14:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/so01-vs-sbwp/m-p/4131236#M987851</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-05T15:14:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

