<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037855#M965110</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second select query is better because in the first one sorting has been done at the DATABASE level so it will put more load on the database wheraeas second sorting is at internal table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reward if helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-18T07:27:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037852#M965107</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi gurus,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i want to know which is performed better&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI level="1" type="ul"&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT VBELN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;FKART&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FKTYP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VBTYP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WAERK FROM VBRK INTO TABLE IT_VBRK WHERE FKTYP = '736738' ORDER BY VBTYP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                OR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI level="1" type="ul"&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT VBELN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;FKART&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FKTYP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VBTYP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WAERK FROM VBRK INTO TABLE IT_VBRK WHERE FKTYP = '736738' .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SORT IT_VBRK BY I_VBTYP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037852#M965107</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-18T07:20:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037853#M965108</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;2nd one will be better..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;coz in the first one...the select query ll take longer time...as u are doing an additional task of sorting....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reward points...if the ans if helpful &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rudra&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: Rudra Prasanna Mohapatra on Jun 18, 2008 9:24 AM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:22:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037853#M965108</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member195383</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-18T07:22:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037854#M965109</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;2ed select is better&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited by: S.r.v.r.Kumar on Jun 18, 2008 12:53 PM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:22:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037854#M965109</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-18T07:22:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037855#M965110</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second select query is better because in the first one sorting has been done at the DATABASE level so it will put more load on the database wheraeas second sorting is at internal table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reward if helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037855#M965110</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-18T07:27:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037856#M965111</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:37:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/4037856#M965111</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-18T07:37:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

