<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Unicode programs testing in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-programs-testing/m-p/3772374#M907703</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have question about unicode UCCHECK programs testing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we need to do testing after UCCHECK errors are fixed and Unicode flag is set in SE38 to check the functionality and runtime errors in Non-Unicode system? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just do the testing in Unicode system after conversion?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For what volume of programs , we should use transaction SCOV for test coverage?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-06T20:49:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unicode programs testing</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-programs-testing/m-p/3772374#M907703</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have question about unicode UCCHECK programs testing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do we need to do testing after UCCHECK errors are fixed and Unicode flag is set in SE38 to check the functionality and runtime errors in Non-Unicode system? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just do the testing in Unicode system after conversion?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For what volume of programs , we should use transaction SCOV for test coverage?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-programs-testing/m-p/3772374#M907703</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T20:49:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unicode programs testing</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-programs-testing/m-p/3772375#M907704</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Yogita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you removed all Unicode errors and set the flag this just means your program objects run on a Unicode system - either &lt;STRONG&gt;right&lt;/STRONG&gt; or &lt;STRONG&gt;wrong&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore, you must test on a Unicode system. See also: &lt;SPAN __jive_macro_name="thread" id="851704"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend to use transaction SCOV even with a small number of program objects. This way you can make your experiences with the coverage analyzer and you are prepared for "big" development tasks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Uwe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:12:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/unicode-programs-testing/m-p/3772375#M907704</guid>
      <dc:creator>uwe_schieferstein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-06T21:12:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

