<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Authorization with DUMMY in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693193#M889318</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why do we use Dummy instead of leaving out the field from the authorization check?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-14T13:18:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Authorization with DUMMY</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693191#M889316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What does it mean if in the authority check there is a dummy? The program cannot absolve this authorization check successfuly, what is the problem. I have full authority for all components, could it caused by the dummy? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the following code:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'P_TRAVL'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                   ID 'bukrs' FIELD w_header-bukrs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                   ID 'authp' DUMMY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                   ID 'persa' DUMMY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                   ID 'kostl' DUMMY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693191#M889316</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-14T12:53:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization with DUMMY</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693192#M889317</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;DUMMY -- means you don't want to check/include &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this field for authorization check ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:03:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693192#M889317</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-14T13:03:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization with DUMMY</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693193#M889318</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why do we use Dummy instead of leaving out the field from the authorization check?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693193#M889318</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-14T13:18:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization with DUMMY</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693194#M889319</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, some code checking routines (e.g. checkman) would write an error for that statement (SLIN_AUTH - you might have forgotten it), &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards, Norbert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:56:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693194#M889319</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member293734</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-14T14:56:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization with DUMMY</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693195#M889320</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Instead of ID name FIELD f, you can also write ID name DUMMY. This means that no check is performed for the field concerned. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The check can only be performed on CHAR fields. All other field types result in 'unauthorized'. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sriram Ponna.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:00:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693195#M889320</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-14T15:00:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization with DUMMY</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693196#M889321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Norbert, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you make it clean? What should I check?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:53:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693196#M889321</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-14T15:53:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization with DUMMY</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693197#M889322</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically same authorization object is used for many programs, so for example 3 fields 'a','b','c' are added to an authorization object. this auth obj is used in two programs .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the first program you want to put a check on 'a' so you will keep 'b' and 'c' as dummy .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so bottom line is auth obj becomes reusable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:08:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693197#M889322</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-14T18:08:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Authorization with DUMMY</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693198#M889323</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/authorization-with-dummy/m-p/3693198#M889323</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-21T12:18:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

