<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Regarding autorization object in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649377#M878963</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;from the info fiven i suggest to create a template (basis) role and derive that 100 times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-08T05:16:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Regarding autorization object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649376#M878962</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     I have a single role called xyz ,i need to use that role around 100 organisation and also i need to filter according to their respective organisation.How is it possible.Kindly recommmend a solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sekar.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649376#M878962</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-08T03:37:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding autorization object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649377#M878963</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;from the info fiven i suggest to create a template (basis) role and derive that 100 times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649377#M878963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-08T05:16:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding autorization object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649378#M878964</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please use the base role derived concept where in Base role will have org values as * and dervied roles will have your defined org values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:35:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649378#M878964</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-08T09:35:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding autorization object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649379#M878965</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Please use the base role derived concept where in Base role will have org values as * and dervied roles will have your defined org values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The base/master/parent role does not need to have * as org values, lots of places leave them blank.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:05:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649379#M878965</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-08T20:05:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding autorization object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649380#M878966</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would agree with Alex.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not a fan of derived roles, but from that little bit which I do know this * would also "blurr" the fields which are OrgLevel fields from the others which you might have maintained as * because you don't want to use them as a control in your concept.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or do OrgLevel fields have a special colour or some other identification in the master role?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:21:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649380#M878966</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-08T21:21:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding autorization object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649381#M878967</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes u r correct, org values can be left as blank.There is no separate color for org values in Master Role..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius i am not sure why are not fan of derived role concept as this is widely accepted concept in terms of security....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 05:09:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649381#M878967</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-09T05:09:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding autorization object</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649382#M878968</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Anil,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Derived roles are widely accepted, as are composite roles and having manual &amp;amp; changed status authorisation objects.  It doesn't necessarily mean that they are the right thing to do.  Sure, there is a time and a place for them (when we are &lt;EM&gt;only&lt;/EM&gt; deriving at Org Level - quite possibly this scenario) but they can cause plenty of problems if used to support a design which doesn't lend itself to this technique.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 06:23:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-autorization-object/m-p/3649382#M878968</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-09T06:23:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

