<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Info Needed in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/info-needed/m-p/3564424#M857753</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had used FIDCCP02 (Basic Idoc type) and IDOC_INPUT_FIDCC1 few years back for interface between Siebel &amp;amp; SAP. But we finally switched to BDc, because error handling became extreemly complecated. We were not having strong functional to build all validations in the code. &amp;amp; this FM not always points to the exact error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This FM also interanlly calls a BDC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have a Functional person who can think of all possible data validations then it works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-18T08:24:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Info Needed</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/info-needed/m-p/3564423#M857752</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      We are using RFBIBL00 (Batch Input Documents) program to posting the FI documents to SAP through file interface. We are planning to go with ALE IDOC for the same, can anybody please suggest best way to archive the same. We come accross IDOC FIDCCP02 (Basic Idoc type) and IDOC_INPUT_FIDCC1 function module for above scenario, pls let me know will it work or not? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kannan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:27:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/info-needed/m-p/3564423#M857752</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-18T06:27:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Info Needed</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/info-needed/m-p/3564424#M857753</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had used FIDCCP02 (Basic Idoc type) and IDOC_INPUT_FIDCC1 few years back for interface between Siebel &amp;amp; SAP. But we finally switched to BDc, because error handling became extreemly complecated. We were not having strong functional to build all validations in the code. &amp;amp; this FM not always points to the exact error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This FM also interanlly calls a BDC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have a Functional person who can think of all possible data validations then it works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/info-needed/m-p/3564424#M857753</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-18T08:24:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

