<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Not  all objects  .... in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475160#M835320</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok...Now I get !! Self learnign is slow !! and ..PANFUL !!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;..So the theory is if in SU24 the object is checked  or check and maintian then the object is pulled into maintan the authorization too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good learning !! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:25:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-11T17:25:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475151#M835311</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When on creating a role, for example when I include F.16 and then goin to the Change authorizations  I see that not all the objects have been pulled ( I can see the the values associated with this tcd in Su24) Why is that ? should I include the objects manually ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example the  object: F_BKPF_BUK is missing all that has been brought in is S_PROGRAM  with fld P_action , P_GROUP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the possible reason ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:19:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475151#M835311</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-10T21:19:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475152#M835312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;George,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;F_BKPF_BUK proposal is NO for F.16 both in versions 4.7 and ECC 6.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can be made YES if you want to restrict the Balance Carry Forward only for certain company codes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muthu Kumaran KG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:38:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475152#M835312</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-10T21:38:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475153#M835313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you check the note 725178 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:39:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475153#M835313</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-10T21:39:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475154#M835314</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello George,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which release level and SP level is your accounting system on?...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475154#M835314</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-10T21:46:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475155#M835315</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am on 46C and SP level is 2307&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:48:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475155#M835315</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T13:48:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475156#M835316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The said note is not pertinent to this issue. Its about checking values. here the question is why the oobjects themselves are not  populated fo rmaintianing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:29:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475156#M835316</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T14:29:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475157#M835317</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; The said note is not pertinent to this issue. Its about checking values. here the question is why the oobjects themselves are not  populated fo rmaintianing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muthu's comment appears to address that, unless you can confirm that the values in SU24 are set as proposal = YES&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475157#M835317</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T15:08:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475158#M835318</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;F_BKPF_BUK is one of the objects thats not &lt;EM&gt;brought in&lt;/EM&gt; inorder to maintian. the other objects include G_GLTP,G_REPO,G_REPO_LOC..andfew more. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not considering if the object is being checked--if so for the object F_*_BUK_ the note is right.....but &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You mentioned in the post of "SU24 are set as proposal = YES" Whats this  ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:32:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475158#M835318</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T16:32:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475159#M835319</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;George,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SU24 has the relation between TCD and the objects. This will tell you which objects will be checked when you execute the transaction. If the object is mentioned YES in SU24 then it will be checked while executing the transaction and no if vice versa.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As said I verified F.16 and the mentioned object proposal is NO. So it will not be pulled into PFCG nor checked for authority hile executing F.16.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muthu Kumaran KG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475159#M835319</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T17:06:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475160#M835320</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok...Now I get !! Self learnign is slow !! and ..PANFUL !!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;..So the theory is if in SU24 the object is checked  or check and maintian then the object is pulled into maintan the authorization too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good learning !! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:25:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475160#M835320</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T17:25:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not  all objects  ....</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475161#M835321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muth's input helped a great !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:53:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/not-all-objects/m-p/3475161#M835321</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T17:53:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

