<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BAPI in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi/m-p/3377758#M811040</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL simply is a wrapper for BAPI_MATERIAL_GET_ALL. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is to say, BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL calls the BAPI BAPI_MATERIAL_GET_ALL itnernally.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason a new BAPI was created was to create an interface (signature - importing/exporting parameters) which are more readable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;E.g. STGE_LOC in BAPI_MATERIAL_GET_ALL is replaced with STORAGELOCATION in BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL, hence it is easier for a developer to map to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Hence use BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aditya&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:52:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-12T07:52:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BAPI</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi/m-p/3377757#M811039</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Getting Parts UOM ,theses two BAPIS i have found.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but can anybody plz. suggest out of &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1)BAPI_Material_GetAll  and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2)BAPI_Material_get_all &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gives the same result? .which one is better to use?.and if any what is the diffrence between them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi/m-p/3377757#M811039</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-12T07:46:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BAPI</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi/m-p/3377758#M811040</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL simply is a wrapper for BAPI_MATERIAL_GET_ALL. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is to say, BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL calls the BAPI BAPI_MATERIAL_GET_ALL itnernally.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason a new BAPI was created was to create an interface (signature - importing/exporting parameters) which are more readable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;E.g. STGE_LOC in BAPI_MATERIAL_GET_ALL is replaced with STORAGELOCATION in BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL, hence it is easier for a developer to map to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Hence use BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aditya&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:52:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi/m-p/3377758#M811040</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-12T07:52:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

