<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: qRFC Serialization issue in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/qrfc-serialization-issue/m-p/3370914#M809140</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Manish,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why such a requirement of an RFC call dependent on another RFC call but in a separate LUW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideally it should be in the same LUW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try EXPORTING a flag to memory &amp;amp; then importing, though i dont think this would work in case of different LUW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prashant&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-05T03:47:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>qRFC Serialization issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/qrfc-serialization-issue/m-p/3370913#M809139</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anybody help me with a complex scenario with &lt;STRONG&gt;qRFC&lt;/STRONG&gt; calls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two queues currently independent of each other and getting generated in two &lt;U&gt;separate LUWs&lt;/U&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Is there any way to create a dependency between these two such that seconds starts only when first gets finished.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Manish&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/qrfc-serialization-issue/m-p/3370913#M809139</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-05T03:35:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: qRFC Serialization issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/qrfc-serialization-issue/m-p/3370914#M809140</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Manish,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why such a requirement of an RFC call dependent on another RFC call but in a separate LUW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideally it should be in the same LUW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try EXPORTING a flag to memory &amp;amp; then importing, though i dont think this would work in case of different LUW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prashant&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/qrfc-serialization-issue/m-p/3370914#M809140</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-05T03:47:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: qRFC Serialization issue</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/qrfc-serialization-issue/m-p/3370915#M809141</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Prashant,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These two LUWs are two different application funcationalities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Sales Order&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Prodn. Order&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In make to order scenarios the prodn. order is dependent on Sales Order.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do u hv any idea of waiting a queue for other queue to get finished...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Manish&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:51:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/qrfc-serialization-issue/m-p/3370915#M809141</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-05T03:51:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

