<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Trans. ME32K. Batch Input. Problem in header versions with container in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/trans-me32k-batch-input-problem-in-header-versions-with-container/m-p/3357659#M805657</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, what's the alternative you recommend to me not using bapi_agreement_maintain because of the fields?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jose Luis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:27:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-24T08:27:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Trans. ME32K. Batch Input. Problem in header versions with container</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/trans-me32k-batch-input-problem-in-header-versions-with-container/m-p/3357657#M805655</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've got a problem with the transaction ME32K.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The required action is meant to be changing the address delivery in the agreement position.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The bapi BAPI_AGREEMENT_MAINTAIN doesn't solve the problem because the field adrn2 is not present in this function module, so refering to other posts I've decided to implement a batch input.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem starts when I try to introduce REVOK and RSCOD in grid container in section header version. When I simulate the transaction ME32K with shdb the only code appearing is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAPLMEDCMV	0200	X	BDC_OKCODE	=GRIDENTER&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                                        	    	 	BDC_SUBSCR	SAPLMEDCMV                              0100SUB0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAPLMEDCMV	0200	X	BDC_OKCODE	=SAVE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	BDC_SUBSCR	SAPLMEDCMV                              0100SUB0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and then the values 'X' in REVOK and '0007' in RSCOD are not recognized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I introduce the new version in header ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jose Luis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:24:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/trans-me32k-batch-input-problem-in-header-versions-with-container/m-p/3357657#M805655</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-23T16:24:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trans. ME32K. Batch Input. Problem in header versions with container</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/trans-me32k-batch-input-problem-in-header-versions-with-container/m-p/3357658#M805656</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   You cannot do a BDC for this transaction as it is a SAP Enjoy transaction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ravi Kanth&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:25:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/trans-me32k-batch-input-problem-in-header-versions-with-container/m-p/3357658#M805656</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-23T16:25:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trans. ME32K. Batch Input. Problem in header versions with container</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/trans-me32k-batch-input-problem-in-header-versions-with-container/m-p/3357659#M805657</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, what's the alternative you recommend to me not using bapi_agreement_maintain because of the fields?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jose Luis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:27:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/trans-me32k-batch-input-problem-in-header-versions-with-container/m-p/3357659#M805657</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-24T08:27:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trans. ME32K. Batch Input. Problem in header versions with container</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/trans-me32k-batch-input-problem-in-header-versions-with-container/m-p/3357660#M805658</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jose,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;did you find a solution for your issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the same problem now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greets,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Valentin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:57:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/trans-me32k-batch-input-problem-in-header-versions-with-container/m-p/3357660#M805658</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member306656</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-04T09:57:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

