<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi-requisition-change/m-p/3313401#M793611</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mukesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually a BAPI call will eventually update some of the standard tables. If you are copying a bapi fm into a zbapi fm its internally still updating those tables, if the oss note says commenting off the subcontract pr code change is okay then i think your approach is right, otherwise you might end up making some of ur std database tables inconsistent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sameer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:48:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-06T18:48:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi-requisition-change/m-p/3313400#M793610</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to recomment off the coding which prevent Subcontract PR to be changed due to reservation number ( refer to OSS note 501861 &amp;amp;537507 ) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This function is in function group MEWQ. Can i copy the function group to ZMEWQ and then copy BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE to ZBAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE to ZMEWQ, and let my program call the ZBAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this the right way to do it? Please advise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:32:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi-requisition-change/m-p/3313400#M793610</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-06T15:32:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi-requisition-change/m-p/3313401#M793611</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mukesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually a BAPI call will eventually update some of the standard tables. If you are copying a bapi fm into a zbapi fm its internally still updating those tables, if the oss note says commenting off the subcontract pr code change is okay then i think your approach is right, otherwise you might end up making some of ur std database tables inconsistent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sameer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:48:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi-requisition-change/m-p/3313401#M793611</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-06T18:48:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi-requisition-change/m-p/3313402#M793612</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;it seems bapi_pr_change is better&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 07:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi-requisition-change/m-p/3313402#M793612</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-07T07:15:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi-requisition-change/m-p/3313403#M793613</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why not change the BAPI? This way, when upgrading the SAP system you &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will get an automatic message in SPAU. If you are afraid that changing &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the BAPI affects other parts of the SAP-system, just make sure that the &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;code you want to 'delete' is skipped under specific circumstances. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Copying the function means copying the complete function group with al &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the functions in it. And then perhaps you need to change other CALL &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FUNCTION statements if you need to refer to functions within the copied &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;function group etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards.....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chaitanya.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:10:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/bapi-requisition-change/m-p/3313403#M793613</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-07T08:10:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

