topic Re: DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY in Application Development and Automation Discussions

DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY

prince_isaac — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:41:08 GMT

hi gurus

after an upgrade the MM guys are trying to do ME41 and they get the DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY error where structure MC03BF0 is partly active and if i try to activate it i get the error that field ATTYP is specified more than once in the structure.

Re: DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY

Former Member — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:45:40 GMT

Hi Prince,

If you use SE11 for the structure you should be able to find where ATTYP has been defined. Most probably an append has been created for this structure in the previous release with ATTYP as one of the fields.

Just remove ATTYP from your append and the structure should be activated again.

Regards,

John.

Re: DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY

former_member784222 — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:52:49 GMT

Hi,

Please check the runtime object status of the structure

use transaction SE11 ->

goto utilities->runtimeobject->recursive check->

If the log displays any database table that has used this, take that table to SE14. -> EDIT ->

Activate and Adjust database. Make the table runtime consistent and try to do ME41.

Thanks and regards,

S. Chandra Mouli.

Re: DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY

prince_isaac — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:58:10 GMT

hie

i tried the recursive check but only the same structure comes up again and is inconsistencies. going to the database utility the error that the structure MC03BF0 cannot be adjusted is displayed.

Re: DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY

prince_isaac — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:07:21 GMT

hie John,

The structure MC03BF0 has an include strcture which is activate and includes the field ATTYP also an include structure which also has the field ATTYP again which is active plus the table itself has the field ATTYP however partly-active. do i remove the field ATTYP from the table and leave the structures intact??

Re: DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY

Former Member — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:12:49 GMT

try to activate the structure by the transactino SE14.

Bye

enzo

Re: DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY

prince_isaac — Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:50:31 GMT

Deleting the field ATTYP activating and adjusting through SE14 solved my problem.