<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Deleting a BADI implementation in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/deleting-a-badi-implementation/m-p/3213540#M766136</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We implemented a BADI (GM_CHANGE_ATTRIBUTES) in our Q/A client to test the solution for a problem associated with retirement of assets purchased with a grant account.  The BADI implementation and the code that we added did not fix the problem.  The transport was therefore never moved to Production.  Because we have since pursued a different solution through configuration, we decided to get rid of the BADI implementation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the Development client, we deleted the BADI implementation and moved the transport to the Q/A client.  The transport at first failed but then was successfully imported to the Q/A client.  According to the Development manager, deleting the BADI supposedly caused a problem with versioning and deleted some objects.  The manager then had a developer recreate the BADI implementation in the Development client, inactivate it, and then transport it to the Q/A client.  We therefore have the BADI implementation back in the Q/A client but inactive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Was it bad practice to delete the BADI implementation?  Does it cause problems to delete a BADI implementation?  What is the recommended practice for getting rid of a BADI implementation from your Q/A client that has never gone to Production?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris Huff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-07T20:58:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Deleting a BADI implementation</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/deleting-a-badi-implementation/m-p/3213540#M766136</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We implemented a BADI (GM_CHANGE_ATTRIBUTES) in our Q/A client to test the solution for a problem associated with retirement of assets purchased with a grant account.  The BADI implementation and the code that we added did not fix the problem.  The transport was therefore never moved to Production.  Because we have since pursued a different solution through configuration, we decided to get rid of the BADI implementation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the Development client, we deleted the BADI implementation and moved the transport to the Q/A client.  The transport at first failed but then was successfully imported to the Q/A client.  According to the Development manager, deleting the BADI supposedly caused a problem with versioning and deleted some objects.  The manager then had a developer recreate the BADI implementation in the Development client, inactivate it, and then transport it to the Q/A client.  We therefore have the BADI implementation back in the Q/A client but inactive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Was it bad practice to delete the BADI implementation?  Does it cause problems to delete a BADI implementation?  What is the recommended practice for getting rid of a BADI implementation from your Q/A client that has never gone to Production?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris Huff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/deleting-a-badi-implementation/m-p/3213540#M766136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-07T20:58:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deleting a BADI implementation</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/deleting-a-badi-implementation/m-p/3213541#M766137</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    I don't see anything wrong in deleting a Badi Implementation afaik.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Deleting a badi definition can be fatal though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From what it looks likem there are other changes that got transported along with the badi implementation deletion and caused some problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway, I will wait with you for some more expert comments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ravi Kanth Talagana&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:43:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/deleting-a-badi-implementation/m-p/3213541#M766137</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-07T22:43:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deleting a BADI implementation</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/deleting-a-badi-implementation/m-p/3213542#M766138</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We delete a BADI implementation usually when SAP allows only single implementations(Multiple implementations not allowed).In rest of the case we deactivate it and transport accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another way is to comment the code in the active implementation and transport.Deletion of an active implementation should be last resort in environment like QA or higher.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question also depends on the client's perspective if it needs to be removed completely or simply deactivated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Byju&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 09:47:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/deleting-a-badi-implementation/m-p/3213542#M766138</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-09T09:47:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deleting a BADI implementation</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/deleting-a-badi-implementation/m-p/3213543#M766139</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your responses.  We were definitely deleting a BADI implementation ( a Z object) and not a definition.  Unfortunately, I don't have the details on the problems that were created in the Q/A system by deleting the BADI implementation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It sounds as though the least risky approach is to just comment or remove the custom code in the BADI implementation and then inactivate it.  I still don't like the idea however of transporting it (the inactive BADI implementation) through to Production when it does not exist there and is not needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris Huff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/deleting-a-badi-implementation/m-p/3213543#M766139</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-14T15:26:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

