topic Re: Activation Errors for Two tables in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Activation Errors for Two tables

Former Member — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:54:20 GMT

Dear all,

I am a basis guy, performing upgrade from 4.6c to ECC6.0. During the ACT_700 phase I am facing the two errors in the shadow instance.

Basically two tables are not activated. But while activating the table I get the below errors:

1. Table : TXW_GLACC

Check view J_1I_EWT_RETURN (DDIC/16.12.07/23:42)

Key field J_1IEWTCHLN-BELNR missing

All fields are evaluated as key field

Search help J_1IEWT_CHALLAN not inherited: Basis field J_1IEWTCHLN-AUGBL missing in view

View logging: active nametab header could not be read

View must be created in the database

View J_1I_EWT_RETURN is consistent

can someone brief me what I need to do to solve the above problem.

2. Table : J_1I_EWT_RETURN

Check table TXW_GLACC (DDIC/16.12.07/23:51)

Enhancement category 2 possible, but include or subty. not yet classified

Field KTOKS in table TXW_GLACC is specified twice. Please check

Check on table TXW_GLACC resulted in errors

I have checked but there the field KTOTS is not specified twice.

Can you pl help me to over come the above issue also.

Since I am a basis guy and we don't have our ABAP team yet, require your help in detail

Thanks & Regards

Senthil

Re: Activation Errors for Two tables

Former Member — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:34:02 GMT

The second issue is because SAP is adding KTOKS to the table and it already has that field in TXW_GLACC. Check for custom includes in the table. One of the custom includes might be having this field. You have to go ahead and delete this field from that include to make this table active.

Re: Activation Errors for Two tables

Former Member — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:24:12 GMT

Thank you, I have deleted the field KTOKS in the table structure (but not inside the include, as it is in the source system) and executed the same.

I have also written to OSS for asking the correct way

Thanks & Regards

Senthil

Re: Activation Errors for Two tables

Former Member — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:22:11 GMT

As per my knowledge,the proper way should be to delete it from the include and leave the field in the table structure as is.

Anyway, OSS might get back to you with the correct solution.