<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance Tunning in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126725#M742669</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is a better option if the structure of both table are same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;itab1[] = itab2[]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:56:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-22T05:56:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance Tunning</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126722#M742666</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which one is better among the two : &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Loop &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Move-Corresponding ta2 to tab1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Endloop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Loop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  tab1-f1 = tab2 -f1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Endloop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:54:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126722#M742666</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-22T05:54:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Tunning</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126723#M742667</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;second one ofcourse&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126723#M742667</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-22T05:55:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Tunning</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126724#M742668</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the first case you should have the same field names&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so if there are are not matching fields it may be problem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;where as in second case since you are moving the particular field it is good always&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anycase in both cases we have to use append Itab.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anji&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126724#M742668</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-22T05:56:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Tunning</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126725#M742669</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is a better option if the structure of both table are same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;itab1[] = itab2[]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:56:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126725#M742669</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-22T05:56:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Tunning</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126726#M742670</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Loop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tab1-f1 = tab2 -f1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Endloop. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is the better option to choose &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;because in the 1st one your useing MOVE CORRESPONDING it is not good to us e&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-tunning/m-p/3126726#M742670</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-22T05:58:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

