<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MIGO Dump in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/migo-dump/m-p/3005261#M710144</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While doing MIGO for Delivery I am geeting a run time error, I am giving the details of the error below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Runtime Errors MESSAGE_TYPE_X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Date and Time 05.11.2007 06:05:17&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Short dump has not been completely stored (too big)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ShrtText&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current application triggered a termination with a short dump.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What happened?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current application program detected a situation which really&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;should not occur. Therefore, a termination with a short dump was&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;triggered on purpose by the key word MESSAGE (type X).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Error analysis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Short text of error message:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could not determine recipients for message type INVCON&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Technical information about the message:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diagnosis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An IDoc of message type INVCON was passed to the ALE layer, but the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;three receiver fields in the header record were not filled. In this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;case the ALE layer tries to determine the receivers from the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;entries in the distribution model. There are no entries available&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the distribution model for the above message type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Procedure&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Define the receivers in your distribution model for this message&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;type or deactivate distribution for these message types.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message classe...... "B1"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number.............. 003&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 1.......... "INVCON"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 2.......... " "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 3.......... " "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 4.......... " "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 3.......... " "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 4.......... " "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gger Location of Runtime Error&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Program SAPLMBWL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Include LMBWLU21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Row 53&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Module type (FUNCTION)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Module Name MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rce Code Extract&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e SourceCde&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;23 ENDIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;24 xcommit = x. "Performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;25 IF NOT xblnr_sd IS INITIAL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;26 xmkpf-xblnr = xblnr_sd.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;27 MODIFY xmkpf INDEX 1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;28 * when a goods movement for an inbound or outbound delivery is posted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;29 * directly from VL31N/ VL01N, XBLNR is not yet known when we call&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;30 * CKMV_AC_DOCUMENT_CREATE, but the number is supposed to be stored in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;31 * BKPF as well. There is no other way to forward XBLNR to FI as not&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;32 * every document is posted by MB_CREATE -&amp;gt; a new function module in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;33 * MBWL for transferring the information, called by FI, meant to load&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;34 * the complete function group for all MBxx postings when this isn't&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;35 * required (Performance). Would be the better way to transport the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;36 * information after switching off MBxx in later release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;37 * corresponding IMPORT ... FROM MEMORY ... can be found in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;38 * AC_DOCUMENT_POST (FORM FI_DOCUMENT_PREPARE (LFACIF5D))&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;39 l_mem_id = 'MKPF-XBLNR'. " 641365&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;40 EXPORT xblnr = xblnr_sd TO MEMORY ID l_mem_id. " 641365&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;41 ENDIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;42 IF xmkpf-xabln IS INITIAL. "note 434093&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;43 CALL FUNCTION 'MB_XAB_NUMBER_GET'. "note 434093&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;44 ENDIF. "note 434093&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;45 CALL FUNCTION 'MB_CREATE_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_UT'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;46 EXCEPTIONS error_message = 4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;47 * As soon as we have started to put things into UPDATE TASK, we must&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;48 * ensure that errors definitely terminate the transaction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;49 * MESSAGE A is not sufficient because it can be catched from&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;50 * external callers which COMMIT WORK afterwards, resulting in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;51 * incomplete updates. Read note 385830 for the full story.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;52 IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE x NUMBER sy-msgno WITH "385830&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;54 sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;55 * MESSAGE A263.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;56 ENDIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The programme was terminated in line 53 where there was a note 385830, I am trying to apply note 556000, is this the right approach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please guide me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suresh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-05T12:24:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MIGO Dump</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/migo-dump/m-p/3005261#M710144</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While doing MIGO for Delivery I am geeting a run time error, I am giving the details of the error below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Runtime Errors MESSAGE_TYPE_X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Date and Time 05.11.2007 06:05:17&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Short dump has not been completely stored (too big)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ShrtText&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current application triggered a termination with a short dump.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What happened?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current application program detected a situation which really&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;should not occur. Therefore, a termination with a short dump was&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;triggered on purpose by the key word MESSAGE (type X).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Error analysis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Short text of error message:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could not determine recipients for message type INVCON&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Technical information about the message:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diagnosis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An IDoc of message type INVCON was passed to the ALE layer, but the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;three receiver fields in the header record were not filled. In this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;case the ALE layer tries to determine the receivers from the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;entries in the distribution model. There are no entries available&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the distribution model for the above message type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Procedure&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Define the receivers in your distribution model for this message&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;type or deactivate distribution for these message types.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message classe...... "B1"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number.............. 003&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 1.......... "INVCON"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 2.......... " "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 3.......... " "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 4.......... " "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 3.......... " "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable 4.......... " "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gger Location of Runtime Error&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Program SAPLMBWL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Include LMBWLU21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Row 53&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Module type (FUNCTION)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Module Name MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rce Code Extract&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e SourceCde&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;23 ENDIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;24 xcommit = x. "Performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;25 IF NOT xblnr_sd IS INITIAL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;26 xmkpf-xblnr = xblnr_sd.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;27 MODIFY xmkpf INDEX 1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;28 * when a goods movement for an inbound or outbound delivery is posted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;29 * directly from VL31N/ VL01N, XBLNR is not yet known when we call&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;30 * CKMV_AC_DOCUMENT_CREATE, but the number is supposed to be stored in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;31 * BKPF as well. There is no other way to forward XBLNR to FI as not&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;32 * every document is posted by MB_CREATE -&amp;gt; a new function module in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;33 * MBWL for transferring the information, called by FI, meant to load&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;34 * the complete function group for all MBxx postings when this isn't&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;35 * required (Performance). Would be the better way to transport the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;36 * information after switching off MBxx in later release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;37 * corresponding IMPORT ... FROM MEMORY ... can be found in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;38 * AC_DOCUMENT_POST (FORM FI_DOCUMENT_PREPARE (LFACIF5D))&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;39 l_mem_id = 'MKPF-XBLNR'. " 641365&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;40 EXPORT xblnr = xblnr_sd TO MEMORY ID l_mem_id. " 641365&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;41 ENDIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;42 IF xmkpf-xabln IS INITIAL. "note 434093&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;43 CALL FUNCTION 'MB_XAB_NUMBER_GET'. "note 434093&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;44 ENDIF. "note 434093&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;45 CALL FUNCTION 'MB_CREATE_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_UT'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;46 EXCEPTIONS error_message = 4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;47 * As soon as we have started to put things into UPDATE TASK, we must&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;48 * ensure that errors definitely terminate the transaction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;49 * MESSAGE A is not sufficient because it can be catched from&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;50 * external callers which COMMIT WORK afterwards, resulting in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;51 * incomplete updates. Read note 385830 for the full story.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;52 IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE x NUMBER sy-msgno WITH "385830&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;54 sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;55 * MESSAGE A263.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;56 ENDIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The programme was terminated in line 53 where there was a note 385830, I am trying to apply note 556000, is this the right approach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please guide me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suresh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/migo-dump/m-p/3005261#M710144</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-05T12:24:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MIGO Dump</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/migo-dump/m-p/3005262#M710145</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;problem with user exit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:50:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/migo-dump/m-p/3005262#M710145</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-18T10:50:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MIGO Dump</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/migo-dump/m-p/3005263#M710146</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi , &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the dump is correct . becuase of inconsistency system going to dump.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Put a break point at below FM and debug the FM and find out why sy-subrc eq 4 and where it is happenning. The reason for dump is not because of ABAP it is because of the Wrong functional process(some where in Config).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CALL FUNCTION 'MB_CREATE_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_UT'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    EXCEPTIONS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      error_message = 4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.( other than 0 goes to dump)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE x NUMBER sy-msgno WITH         "385830&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;               sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI level="1" type="ul"&gt;&lt;P&gt;    MESSAGE A263.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ENDIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:48:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/migo-dump/m-p/3005263#M710146</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-18T12:48:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

