<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: @ DATA ELEMENTS V/S BUILT IN DATA TYPES in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/data-elements-v-s-built-in-data-types/m-p/2990988#M706419</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi Anand,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there are hundred thousands of object in the Data Dictionary, so 15 won't harm much &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; On the other hand, if you build up an ALV list based on this table, than it is good that you have these texts there with translations, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JozsefSzikszai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-25T09:53:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>@ DATA ELEMENTS V/S BUILT IN DATA TYPES</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/data-elements-v-s-built-in-data-types/m-p/2990987#M706418</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 15 fields in a custom table. All the fileds need to hav a definition of char- lt 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the Description i each differs only wrt to the NUMBER sequence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eg. level 1, level 2...level 15.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now what is a recommended way to go about it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should we define 15 different DATA ELEMENTS for the same, resulting in 15 new objects in the dictionary. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OR should I go in for a simple Built In data type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know data elements have advantages when it comes to a. F4 help and Table Maintainance. Is the advantage so significant that we can do with 15 additional objects?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please Advice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/data-elements-v-s-built-in-data-types/m-p/2990987#M706418</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-25T09:49:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: @ DATA ELEMENTS V/S BUILT IN DATA TYPES</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/data-elements-v-s-built-in-data-types/m-p/2990988#M706419</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi Anand,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there are hundred thousands of object in the Data Dictionary, so 15 won't harm much &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; On the other hand, if you build up an ALV list based on this table, than it is good that you have these texts there with translations, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/data-elements-v-s-built-in-data-types/m-p/2990988#M706419</guid>
      <dc:creator>JozsefSzikszai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-25T09:53:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: @ DATA ELEMENTS V/S BUILT IN DATA TYPES</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/data-elements-v-s-built-in-data-types/m-p/2990989#M706420</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can use the same data element for the remaining fileds also if your structure requires the same data element&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pavan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:56:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/data-elements-v-s-built-in-data-types/m-p/2990989#M706420</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-25T09:56:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

