<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FB70 authorization on posting... in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb70-authorization-on-posting/m-p/2974249#M702022</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm afraid I'll have to answer this question myself just in case if anyone needs related help in future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the mentioned scenario, User A can access directly transaction fv70 which allows the user to only park. While User B can be given full authorization of fb70 to park and post!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muzammil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:27:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-02T10:27:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FB70 authorization on posting...</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb70-authorization-on-posting/m-p/2974248#M702021</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear friends,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scenario is like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;User A should only be able to park an invoice in transaction FB70&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;meanwhile, User B should be able to park and post!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've went through su24 and found "A_B_ANLKL" which applies authorization over posting. Unfortunately, after blocking "create(post)" as well as disabling the whole object didn't help in achieving the goal. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please suggest a solution ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muzammil.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb70-authorization-on-posting/m-p/2974248#M702021</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-01T10:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FB70 authorization on posting...</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb70-authorization-on-posting/m-p/2974249#M702022</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm afraid I'll have to answer this question myself just in case if anyone needs related help in future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the mentioned scenario, User A can access directly transaction fv70 which allows the user to only park. While User B can be given full authorization of fb70 to park and post!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Muzammil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:27:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/fb70-authorization-on-posting/m-p/2974249#M702022</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-02T10:27:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

