<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Selecting from FMIOI - performance question in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/selecting-from-fmioi-performance-question/m-p/2682358#M620128</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I select from FMIOI using one fund (FONDS) and one fund center (FISTL) (let's call it fund center 1), I get results very quickly (within seconds).  If I use the same fund and a different fund center (let's call it fund center 2), I still get results back quickly.  But if I use the same fund as above and both fund centers 1 and 2 as selection criteria, it takes a long time to get results back.  I see this behavior in both my custom program and when using SE16.  Can anyone explain why selecting from FMIOI with two fund centers causes such a performance problem when individually the fund centers return with no problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:30:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-20T19:30:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Selecting from FMIOI - performance question</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/selecting-from-fmioi-performance-question/m-p/2682358#M620128</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I select from FMIOI using one fund (FONDS) and one fund center (FISTL) (let's call it fund center 1), I get results very quickly (within seconds).  If I use the same fund and a different fund center (let's call it fund center 2), I still get results back quickly.  But if I use the same fund as above and both fund centers 1 and 2 as selection criteria, it takes a long time to get results back.  I see this behavior in both my custom program and when using SE16.  Can anyone explain why selecting from FMIOI with two fund centers causes such a performance problem when individually the fund centers return with no problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:30:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/selecting-from-fmioi-performance-question/m-p/2682358#M620128</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-20T19:30:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Selecting from FMIOI - performance question</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/selecting-from-fmioi-performance-question/m-p/2682359#M620129</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't prove it, but my best guess is that the database optimizer gets confused. And unfortunately it doesn't take much either as you have seen yourself. I have seen the same behaviour with other tables, where selection_time(1) + selection_time(2) &amp;lt;&amp;lt; selection_time(1+2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The database could perform one selection, then the next one, take a coffee break, and still return results much quicker than it does when selecting for both criteria.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:02:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/selecting-from-fmioi-performance-question/m-p/2682359#M620129</guid>
      <dc:creator>KjetilKilhavn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-21T12:02:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

