<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance large (condition) tables advice in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-large-condition-tables-advice/m-p/2657453#M612861</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Erik&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wondering if you resolved your condition table performance issue. We are having similar performance issue on A915 table. Please let me know if you have any ideas or any information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;jampalat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 02:01:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-12T02:01:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance large (condition) tables advice</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-large-condition-tables-advice/m-p/2657451#M612859</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure if this is the right subforum for this, but thought this is the most suitable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are currently executing a roll out project integrating a new company&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in our ECC 5.00 system in a existing client already used by 3 other&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;companies. We use a table (A950) in the system for storing general&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sales prices (key: application/condition type/sales&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;organisation/distribution channel/material/end date valid).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MANDT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KAPPL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KSCHL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VKORG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VTWEG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MATNR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DATBI&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DATAB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KNUMH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently the table holds 1,2 million entries. At the go-live of the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;new company 3 new condition types will be added to the A950 table and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the table will then grow to hold approx.5-6 million entries. We expect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to add 3-4 million condition records for the new condition types.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are concerned if this number of entries will significantly reduce&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;performance in pricing as we expect this table will be heavily&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;accessed as 1 of the added condition types will be needed during almost&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;every pricing determination for new sales orders/quotations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it with regards to performance better to add the 3 new condition&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;types to (separate) new condition tables (We expect to add 3-4 million&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;condition records for the new condition types), so there is some&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;spreading of the load. Hope anyone has advice for us concerning this matter.  Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Erik Mulder&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-large-condition-tables-advice/m-p/2657451#M612859</guid>
      <dc:creator>erik_mulder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-20T10:36:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance large (condition) tables advice</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-large-condition-tables-advice/m-p/2657452#M612860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to talk to your DBA and Basis about this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-large-condition-tables-advice/m-p/2657452#M612860</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jelena_Perfiljeva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-22T20:01:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance large (condition) tables advice</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-large-condition-tables-advice/m-p/2657453#M612861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Erik&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wondering if you resolved your condition table performance issue. We are having similar performance issue on A915 table. Please let me know if you have any ideas or any information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;jampalat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 02:01:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-large-condition-tables-advice/m-p/2657453#M612861</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-12T02:01:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance large (condition) tables advice</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-large-condition-tables-advice/m-p/2657454#M612862</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are not live yet, so we don't know for sure if there is gonna be a problem. We decided to split the condition types over separate tables to distribute the load.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-large-condition-tables-advice/m-p/2657454#M612862</guid>
      <dc:creator>erik_mulder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-12T09:09:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

