<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance Releated small doubt. in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580168#M589926</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Abhishek,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As both of the doing same thing, the only minor difference is that you are callling Refresh 4 times in statement 1 which is taking time to execute comparing to statement 2. As memory point of view it is not occupying memory instead it freeing the memory that is utilized by the internal tables. So it is better to use statement 2 instead of statement 1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Rewards points if it is useful.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kinjal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:06:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-07-26T08:06:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance Releated small doubt.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580165#M589923</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have one doubt can you tell me as per performance issues or SAP standard which statement is better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Statement 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REFRESH : i_tab1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REFRESH : i_tab2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REFRESH : i_tab3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REFRESH : i_tab4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Statement 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REFRESH : i_tab1, i_tab2, i_tab3, i_tab4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know both will do the same results but as per SAP standard and seeing performance which will be better is there any difference in performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will SAP complire takes the same memory in executing the 2 statements&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can u guys help me out with explanation..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:56:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580165#M589923</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-26T07:56:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Releated small doubt.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580166#M589924</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Abhishek,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think there is no difference between Statement1 and Statement2 in the performance wise but Statement2 will gives you more readable than Statement1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Internally Statement2 will be spilted like Statement1 only. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vinay&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:03:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580166#M589924</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-26T08:03:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Releated small doubt.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580167#M589925</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No difference at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is just a readability which will matter. Option 2 is the recommended one with slight modification as&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REFRESH : i_tab1, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i_tab2, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i_tab3, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i_tab4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Atish&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:05:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580167#M589925</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-26T08:05:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Releated small doubt.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580168#M589926</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Abhishek,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As both of the doing same thing, the only minor difference is that you are callling Refresh 4 times in statement 1 which is taking time to execute comparing to statement 2. As memory point of view it is not occupying memory instead it freeing the memory that is utilized by the internal tables. So it is better to use statement 2 instead of statement 1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Rewards points if it is useful.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kinjal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:06:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580168#M589926</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-26T08:06:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Releated small doubt.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580169#M589927</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;only difference in source code, no difference in execution!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:29:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance-releated-small-doubt/m-p/2580169#M589927</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-26T09:29:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

