<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic TVARVC vs SETLEAF - For custom application value maintenance. in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/tvarvc-vs-setleaf-for-custom-application-value-maintenance/m-p/333375#M5600</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have list of values to be pulled from various applications with different conditons. Each value has its application area as top node. For example,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Value = ABC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Area = Sales&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Value = XYZ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Area = Services&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I said earlier, I want to pull all values in Application A, want to pull values of area Sales in Applicable B. And, business may come up with more values in future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to leverage SETLEAF or TVARVC to maintain these values. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question is, in TVARVC if I maintain area name in paramater name (which has scope to modify or new values in future), my query that is intended to pull all areas may not work. I need to try something like below to pull all records with area like 'App_%'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Area = App_Sales, App_Services&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not liking this approach as it doesnot look clean to me. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How about using SETLEAF here? Can we use SETLEAF for custom application parameters? If yes, should I go for multi-dimentional SETs here?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Naveen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2017 20:27:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>naveen_inuganti2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-19T20:27:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TVARVC vs SETLEAF - For custom application value maintenance.</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/tvarvc-vs-setleaf-for-custom-application-value-maintenance/m-p/333375#M5600</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have list of values to be pulled from various applications with different conditons. Each value has its application area as top node. For example,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Value = ABC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Area = Sales&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Value = XYZ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Area = Services&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I said earlier, I want to pull all values in Application A, want to pull values of area Sales in Applicable B. And, business may come up with more values in future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to leverage SETLEAF or TVARVC to maintain these values. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question is, in TVARVC if I maintain area name in paramater name (which has scope to modify or new values in future), my query that is intended to pull all areas may not work. I need to try something like below to pull all records with area like 'App_%'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Area = App_Sales, App_Services&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not liking this approach as it doesnot look clean to me. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How about using SETLEAF here? Can we use SETLEAF for custom application parameters? If yes, should I go for multi-dimentional SETs here?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Naveen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2017 20:27:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/tvarvc-vs-setleaf-for-custom-application-value-maintenance/m-p/333375#M5600</guid>
      <dc:creator>naveen_inuganti2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-19T20:27:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

