<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VL10 (VL04)  problem in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/vl10-vl04-problem/m-p/904496#M55871</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Manohar!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only some general comments (sorry, no solution):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there are two ways of checks:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- directly coded in SAP-functions (you would need modification)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- dynamical added routines (you can replace them by own logic, you will find most (all?) in various places of transaction VOFM)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Still strange scenario, I guess you might run into further problems. Who is creating invoice? The one with bank data, or the one with confirmed quantities?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Somehow split between central system and logistic system was done at a different borderline at other customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But never mind, such decisions are of course very complicate - straight forward ways are of course much simpler, no question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>christian_wohlfahrt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-02-28T15:36:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VL10 (VL04)  problem</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/vl10-vl04-problem/m-p/904495#M55870</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello All, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i create a sales order it inturn posts the data on other system, since other system has no master data avaible it generates a new addresscode even though the ship to party is same for 2 sales orders.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i try to combine the orders for one single delivery it does not combine , as the ship to address codes are different (Though adress content is same).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to tell VL10 not to check for Address code instead search for address content , how can i do it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where does this check happends in first place?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would be very helpful to know your comments ont his.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Manohar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:34:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/vl10-vl04-problem/m-p/904495#M55870</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-28T10:34:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VL10 (VL04)  problem</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/vl10-vl04-problem/m-p/904496#M55871</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Manohar!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only some general comments (sorry, no solution):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there are two ways of checks:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- directly coded in SAP-functions (you would need modification)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- dynamical added routines (you can replace them by own logic, you will find most (all?) in various places of transaction VOFM)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Still strange scenario, I guess you might run into further problems. Who is creating invoice? The one with bank data, or the one with confirmed quantities?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Somehow split between central system and logistic system was done at a different borderline at other customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But never mind, such decisions are of course very complicate - straight forward ways are of course much simpler, no question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/vl10-vl04-problem/m-p/904496#M55871</guid>
      <dc:creator>christian_wohlfahrt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-28T15:36:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VL10 (VL04)  problem</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/vl10-vl04-problem/m-p/904497#M55872</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Christian, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess i need to do some checks on address content in Copy Routine for header! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changing CVBPA data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Invoice is created w.r.t delivery.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your time on this. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Still searching for answers though &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Manohar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:55:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/vl10-vl04-problem/m-p/904497#M55872</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-28T15:55:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

