<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Alternate for tables statement in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/alternate-for-tables-statement/m-p/892877#M53716</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fields are moved from your program to the screen when the field names match.  There is no explicit transport command needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not think that the TABLES command is considered obsolete when used in screen programming.  That is the only time that I use it.  There was some training material in regards to the TABLES command being required for proper transport between the program and the screen.  I do not know if this has changed with 4.7.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:21:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-08T14:21:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Alternate for tables statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/alternate-for-tables-statement/m-p/892876#M53715</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi friends &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i use dictionary fields in the screen i am using tables statement of that corresponding structure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   but i think tables statement is obsolete one is it right so what is the alternative for tables statement &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how to move the values of fields between screen and abap program, help me&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;           thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:28:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/alternate-for-tables-statement/m-p/892876#M53715</guid>
      <dc:creator>shiva_suvarna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-08T13:28:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alternate for tables statement</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/alternate-for-tables-statement/m-p/892877#M53716</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fields are moved from your program to the screen when the field names match.  There is no explicit transport command needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not think that the TABLES command is considered obsolete when used in screen programming.  That is the only time that I use it.  There was some training material in regards to the TABLES command being required for proper transport between the program and the screen.  I do not know if this has changed with 4.7.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:21:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/alternate-for-tables-statement/m-p/892877#M53716</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-08T14:21:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

