<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Substitute for SE49 in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/substitute-for-se49/m-p/876949#M50854</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Raja,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think so too :-).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lalitha,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm rewarding points to Raja's answer and marking this thread as answered. Please feel free to change the points assignment and/or mark the thread as unanswered if you don't agree. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anand Mandalika.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P.S. : And I reiterate, you are at liberty to change the moderator's assignment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-06-07T10:39:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Substitute for SE49</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/substitute-for-se49/m-p/876946#M50851</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Is there any substitute for SE49 transaction in 4.7 version of SAP?,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 07:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/substitute-for-se49/m-p/876946#M50851</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-07T07:33:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Substitute for SE49</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/substitute-for-se49/m-p/876947#M50852</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;the underlying program (SAPMSEUZ) exists in 4.7&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;assign your own transaction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raja&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 07:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/substitute-for-se49/m-p/876947#M50852</guid>
      <dc:creator>athavanraja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-07T07:37:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Substitute for SE49</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/substitute-for-se49/m-p/876948#M50853</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i think the question is answered and it deserves to be marked as answered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do you think?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raja&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:18:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/substitute-for-se49/m-p/876948#M50853</guid>
      <dc:creator>athavanraja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-07T09:18:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Substitute for SE49</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/substitute-for-se49/m-p/876949#M50854</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Raja,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think so too :-).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lalitha,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm rewarding points to Raja's answer and marking this thread as answered. Please feel free to change the points assignment and/or mark the thread as unanswered if you don't agree. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anand Mandalika.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P.S. : And I reiterate, you are at liberty to change the moderator's assignment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/substitute-for-se49/m-p/876949#M50854</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-07T10:39:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

