<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262812#M490670</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;who would do such a thing? Performance is always measured against the requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a report with an answer time of 10 minutes is performing great, if it has to modify e.G. 3 million MARC records witha value that maybe has still to be calculated by a timewasting algorythm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;while another report running in 0.1 seconds is still to be called NOT performative cause all it does is reading e.G. ONE SINGLE record of a customizing table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And well the Customer is the King, as long as there is no requirement to enhance the performance of a report, you shouldnt do it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No requirement -&amp;gt; no order -&amp;gt; no money paid but still the chance to implement new faults.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:26:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T09:26:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262808#M490666</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We need to analyze the performance of our ABAP team and their various reports based on performance , SE30 , ST05 will give some results , How to measure a program and say it is performance wise good ? Take for example you have 4 reports and say which report is good on terms of performance ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262808#M490666</guid>
      <dc:creator>p291102</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-15T08:24:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262809#M490667</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using SE30, the database count should be minimum , system should be minimum but its good to have maximum count for ABAP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For SQL Trce, if you query is not optimised, it will be displayed in red/pink color. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This means it need attention.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;YOu can improve the performance of select query by using all the primary keys and in the same sequence as they are in the table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If in the where clause, you dont require a perticular primary key, you can use a blank range for the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this answers your query.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regads,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:17:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262809#M490667</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-15T09:17:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262810#M490668</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi sankar,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;just some thoughts on your question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;focus on those code fragments and routines ( like FORM ... ) that do take very long to run.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;check wheter you have nested loops and replace them by appropriate logic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;check how you access internal tables ( best is READ... BINARY SEARCH or READ... INDEX ... )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;delete all unused code / variables&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;avoid SELECT - Statements and insert/update operations within loops as well as you should generally avoid access database - rather operate with an internal table representing database table and then modify databasetable from internal table at one single operation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you may also have a look in the "Performance &amp;amp; Tuning" section of SDN forums,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please award points if helpful!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clemens&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:23:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262810#M490668</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member5350</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-15T09:23:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262811#M490669</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &amp;lt;b&amp;gt; Performance of a program decreases much if the number of database hits are more.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  go to SE30, Runtime analysis and execute the program and analyze the reports given by system. Click on Hit List to know complete usage of memory and hits to database for different subroutines. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sailaja.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262811#M490669</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-15T09:23:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262812#M490670</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;who would do such a thing? Performance is always measured against the requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a report with an answer time of 10 minutes is performing great, if it has to modify e.G. 3 million MARC records witha value that maybe has still to be calculated by a timewasting algorythm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;while another report running in 0.1 seconds is still to be called NOT performative cause all it does is reading e.G. ONE SINGLE record of a customizing table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And well the Customer is the King, as long as there is no requirement to enhance the performance of a report, you shouldnt do it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No requirement -&amp;gt; no order -&amp;gt; no money paid but still the chance to implement new faults.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:26:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/performance/m-p/2262812#M490670</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-15T09:26:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

