<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Query on internal table in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210332#M473329</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for ur help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;venkata prasad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 11:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-01T11:20:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Query on internal table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210328#M473325</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i am confusing how affectively we can use the internal table key words. observe the following two sample codes, plz clarify what is the difference between these two.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REPORT z_sample_report1 .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TYPES: t_spfli&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF spfli.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DATA: itab_flinfo TYPE t_spfli,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      wa_flinfo LIKE LINE OF&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      itab_flinfo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT * FROM spfli INTO TABLE itab_flinfo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  READ TABLE itab_flinfo INTO wa_flinfo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         WITH KEY carrid = 'LH'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                  connid = '2463'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  IF sy-subrc = 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WRITE:/ wa_flinfo-carrid,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        wa_flinfo-connid,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        wa_flinfo-cityfrom,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        wa_flinfo-cityto,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        wa_flinfo-deptime,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        wa_flinfo-arrtime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ENDIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REPORT z_sample_report1 .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DATA: BEGIN OF itab_flinfo OCCURS 6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        INCLUDE STRUCTURE spfli.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DATA: END OF itab_flinfo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DATA: wa_flinfo like line of itab_flinfo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT * FROM spfli INTO TABLE itab_flinfo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  READ TABLE itab_flinfo INTO wa_flinfo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         WITH KEY carrid = 'LH'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                  connid = '2463'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  IF sy-subrc = 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WRITE:/ wa_flinfo-carrid,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        wa_flinfo-connid,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        wa_flinfo-cityfrom,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        wa_flinfo-cityto,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        wa_flinfo-deptime,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        wa_flinfo-arrtime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ENDIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 08:35:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210328#M473325</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-01T08:35:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Query on internal table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210329#M473326</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;TYPES: t_spfli TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF spfli. 
" The above statment does not have the header line, you need to create work area and use that work area

DATA: BEGIN OF itab_flinfo OCCURS 6.
INCLUDE STRUCTURE spfli.
DATA: END OF itab_flinfo.
" This statment will have the header with the internal table, when you looping this internal table there is no need of the Workarea&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Sudheer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 08:40:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210329#M473326</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-01T08:40:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Query on internal table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210330#M473327</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   both declarations are same &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   The difference comes when you want to add one more field to your internal table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Say you want to add one more field say CHECK(1) to your internal table , you cannot add this using the first method but you can do this using the second method&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;DATA: BEGIN OF itab_flinfo OCCURS 6.
INCLUDE STRUCTURE spfli.
data : CHECK(1).
DATA: END OF itab_flinfo.&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 08:43:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210330#M473327</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-01T08:43:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Query on internal table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210331#M473328</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hai ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First way of declaring internal table is effective.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Always internal tables without header line are prefered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because internal tables with header line are are obsolete,( old ,may not work in future,those keywords(occurs,on- change of,..) may be deleted in the next versions).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So First way of declaring internal table is effective.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now free from confusion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regads,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rama.Pammi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 11:06:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210331#M473328</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-01T11:06:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Query on internal table</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210332#M473329</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for ur help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;venkata prasad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 11:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/query-on-internal-table/m-p/2210332#M473329</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-01T11:20:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

