<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: regarding NUMC comparison in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-numc-comparison/m-p/2181464#M463950</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I Don't know what purpose are you comparing these  field in the 2 versions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No doubt it is NUMC of length 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in Ecc 6 it is value 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but see thedocumentation on this field in that table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It says about this field:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Percentage for buffers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This field is not used at the moment!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any entries still present in this field are meaningless!&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so whatever value is present whether it is space or zero it is meaning less and will not be considered for any comparison&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope it is understandable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;reward if useful&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anji&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-04-27T03:53:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>regarding NUMC comparison</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-numc-comparison/m-p/2181463#M463949</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi Gurus,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In table DD02l, Field PROZPUFF is NUMC having values of '0' in 46C and ECC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But when we compare the two field after selecting using SELECT statement, 46C value is changed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to space but ECC is still 0. so comparison fails. why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its  not the case for all other numc fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please suggest us.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ambichan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:08:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-numc-comparison/m-p/2181463#M463949</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-27T03:08:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: regarding NUMC comparison</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-numc-comparison/m-p/2181464#M463950</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I Don't know what purpose are you comparing these  field in the 2 versions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No doubt it is NUMC of length 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in Ecc 6 it is value 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but see thedocumentation on this field in that table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It says about this field:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Percentage for buffers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This field is not used at the moment!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any entries still present in this field are meaningless!&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so whatever value is present whether it is space or zero it is meaning less and will not be considered for any comparison&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope it is understandable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;reward if useful&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anji&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/regarding-numc-comparison/m-p/2181464#M463950</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-27T03:53:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

