<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RESB  Performance in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168014#M459433</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you need to pass the all key fields in where condition .when u write the select statement better to use INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITB.the itab should contains all the field what ever you want retrieve.better use se30 or st05 for performance issue.And also check what are the fields u have to pass ,those are key fields or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if helpful rewards the points.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;kiran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:08:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>former_member223446</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-02T10:08:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RESB  Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168011#M459430</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i hv  retrive the fields stlnr, rsnum, posnr, rsnum,  rspos ,   matnr,    werks ,  stlnr ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;from resb table by passing wempf and aufnr . but this makes report  performance very slow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pl. tel me any alternative table for this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 09:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168011#M459430</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-02T09:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RESB  Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168012#M459431</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you need to pass all the key fields in the where condition&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;wempf and aufnr are non key fields&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message was edited by: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        Chandrasekhar Jagarlamudi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 09:59:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168012#M459431</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-02T09:59:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RESB  Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168013#M459432</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try Hit the RESB table with the primary keys or the secondary indexes/ try to get the secondary field values by some other table&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;try to use FM " MD_STOCK_REQUIREMENTS_LIST_API"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this may help you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;reward if useful&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nazeer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:03:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168013#M459432</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-02T10:03:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RESB  Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168014#M459433</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you need to pass the all key fields in where condition .when u write the select statement better to use INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITB.the itab should contains all the field what ever you want retrieve.better use se30 or st05 for performance issue.And also check what are the fields u have to pass ,those are key fields or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if helpful rewards the points.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;kiran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:08:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168014#M459433</guid>
      <dc:creator>former_member223446</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-02T10:08:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RESB  Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168015#M459434</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi shuba rao &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have found below metione note hope u find helpful &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;reward point if found the answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RSXADR01 runs for a long time if RESB has many entries&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP Note Number: 340066  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Symptom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The RSXADR01 or RSXADR05 or RSXADR02 XPRA report runs for a very long time if the RESB table contains many entries.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other terms &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RSXADR01&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BAS_XPRA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reason and Prerequisites&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It has been known for installations to have more than 10 million entries in the RESB table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the RSXADR05 report was already ran as a preliminary step prior to the upgrade, selection on the RESB will then run completely as records in the RESB cannot be marked as already processed by the preliminary step report.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The RSXADR01 XPRA is always listed in the upgrade logs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The RSXADR01 report calls the RSXADR02, RSXADR03 and RSXADR05 reports internally (using SUBMIT ... AND RETURN).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Solution&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If expert analysis shows that there are no records in the RESB with address number RESB-ADRNR &amp;lt;&amp;gt; SPACE, you can skip selection on the RESB table by modifying the XPRA report and thus, in extreme cases, save several hours of runtime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As this analysis can only occur for a runtime-intensive selection which may ultimately produce an opposite result, you cannot execute this analysis automatically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The place where this modification occurs depends on the release available as well as the notes already implemented.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As of 4.6C Service Release 1, the modification specified in the attached correction instructions 332828 apply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For a target release lower than 4.6C SR1, there are additional dependencies which require further modifications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To prevent errors, the modifications required for releases dlower that 4.6C SR1 are not expressly listed here, but can be provided after analysis by SAP support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ZZ_RESB_COUNT analysis report, which you use (irrespective of the target release) to detect whether there are conversion-relevant addresses in the RESB table, is attached to this note.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The procedure for modifying the RSXADR05 report at the correct time (directly before the XPRA phase) is described in note 421233.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Header Data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Release Status Released for Customer &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Released on 27.07.2004 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Priority Correction with medium priority &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Category Upgrade information &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Primary Component BC-SRV-ADR Address Management / Business Address Services &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Release&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Soft. Component Release Track From Release To Release And Successors &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP_APPL   30   300   31I     &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP_APPL   40   40A   40B     &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP_APPL   45   45A   45B     &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP_APPL   46   46A   46B     &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP_APPL   46C   46C   46C     &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP_APPL   470   470   470     &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correction Instructions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correction Instruction Valid from Valid to Installation Soft. Component ID &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ref. Correction Modification Status Last Changed on     &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0000211426 300 470 0120061532 SAP_APPL 1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; X Released 31.10.2002   10:06:56      &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0000332828 46C 470 0120061532 SAP_APPL 1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; X Released 31.10.2002   10:07:56      &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Support Packages&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No Support Packages available  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Related notes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number Short Text &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0000421233 Most current version of the report RSXADR05 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0000390062 Additional information about upgrading to 4.6C SR2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0000327285 Additions to upgrade to 4.6C SR1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0000313589 RSXADR05 takes long time selecting MPOS, QMIH, EQUZ or AFIH &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Attributes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No attributes available  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Attachments&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No attachments available &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reason - Side Effects&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP Notes / Patches corrected by this Note  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;reward point if found the answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/resb-performance/m-p/2168015#M459434</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-08T04:25:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

