topic Re: Too many recipients - error message in Application Development and Automation Discussions

Too many recipients - error message

Former Member — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:13:23 GMT

Hi Guys,

I am pretty new to ALE and i haveing the following issue,,,

I have a saler order outbound IDOC... Orders05 need to send it to 2 diff logical systems.

I get the error Too many reciepients...

Things that I have tried.

1 - Maintain multiple receiver for the same sender - did not work

2 - Maintain 2 diff entries in the distribution Model.

Any ideas anyone!!

Re: Too many recipients - error message

Former Member — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:14:36 GMT

Go to TOOLS>ALE Development>IDoc Type Development> WE81 and create a new message type and give it a different name - say ORDERS2.

Use WE82 to link it to an IDoc Type - say ORDERS05. So now you will have two message types linked to the same IDoc type. Each message type can now be referred in different logical systems without any clashes.

Now you can use BD64 to build your model using message types ORDERS and ORDERS2 without getting the multiple recipient error message.

Then use WE20 to set up each partner profile using your defined output conditions in message control to trigger the creation of the IDoc.

best regards

John Tabone

Re: Too many recipients - error message

alex_m — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:27:38 GMT

Technically you cant have more than one entry for the message type in distribution model, you need to create a new message type and use that like John said.

Re: Too many recipients - error message

Former Member — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:57:06 GMT

Hi,

If you have maintained all the necessary distribution model and partner profile for 2 logical systems then you need to do the following now:-

1. Ask your functional consultant to create a new output type like the existing output for the 2nd logical system

2. Tell the function consultant that both the output types should be triggered automatically, so that 2 idoc's generated for the same sales order and for different logical system at a time.

Thanks,

Mahesh.