<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R/3 Vs R/2 in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/r-3-vs-r-2/m-p/2045234#M421053</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   R/2 is 2 tier architecture&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   R/3 is 3-tier architecture.In R/3, database was inbuilt in system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vana&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:10:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-26T06:10:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R/3 Vs R/2</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/r-3-vs-r-2/m-p/2045231#M421050</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gurus,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  What is R/3? What is the difference between R/2 and R/3?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ravi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/r-3-vs-r-2/m-p/2045231#M421050</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-26T05:26:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R/3 Vs R/2</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/r-3-vs-r-2/m-p/2045232#M421051</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R/3 is based on 3 tier client/server architecture while R/2 is mainframe based..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hakim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:27:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/r-3-vs-r-2/m-p/2045232#M421051</guid>
      <dc:creator>abdul_hakim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-26T05:27:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R/3 Vs R/2</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/r-3-vs-r-2/m-p/2045233#M421052</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ravi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP R/2 was a mainframe based business application software suite that was very successful in the 1980s and early 1990s. It was particularly popular with large multinational European companies who required soft-real-time business applications, with multi-currency and multi-language capabilities built in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP R/3 is a client/server based application, utilizing a 3-tiered model. A presentation layer, or client, interfaces with the user. The application layer houses all the business-specific logic, and the database layer records and stores all the information about the system, including transactional and configuration data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;reward points if useful&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prajith&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:32:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/r-3-vs-r-2/m-p/2045233#M421052</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-26T05:32:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R/3 Vs R/2</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/r-3-vs-r-2/m-p/2045234#M421053</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   R/2 is 2 tier architecture&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   R/3 is 3-tier architecture.In R/3, database was inbuilt in system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vana&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:10:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/r-3-vs-r-2/m-p/2045234#M421053</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-26T06:10:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

