<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pooled table performance in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025431#M415112</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is not one sales organization&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-05T16:35:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pooled table performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025429#M415110</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a statement like this , which is taking a lot of time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT MATNR DATAB KNUMH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FROM A005&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;APPENDING TABLE IT_COND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_ZCOSTHISTFINAL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE KAPPL = 'V'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND KSCHL = 'PR00'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AND MATNR = IT_ZCOSTHISTFINAL-MATNR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how can i improve the performance of this statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025429#M415110</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-05T16:22:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pooled table performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025430#M415111</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try to pass the sales org VKORG and distribution channel VTWEG also..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Naren&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:27:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025430#M415111</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-05T16:27:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pooled table performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025431#M415112</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is not one sales organization&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025431#M415112</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-05T16:35:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pooled table performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025432#M415113</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you saying you have many sales organizations..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then build a range for the sales organzations and use it in the where clause..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Naren&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:37:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025432#M415113</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-05T16:37:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pooled table performance</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025433#M415114</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its like i have a ztable for storing the material prices , one row in the table per one condition record. I am trying to compare the prices stored in the ztable with the prices in vk13 . so for every record in the ztable, i am getting the conditon record number in the access tables , and then taking price from KONP based on the condition record number. In that process i am accessing A005 also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/pooled-table-performance/m-p/2025433#M415114</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-05T16:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

