topic Re: wrong TYPES definition? in Application Development and Automation Discussions

wrong TYPES definition?

former_member183924 — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:30:10 GMT

Hi experts,

For my selection I define a internal table

This works:

DATA: it_lab_data  TYPE TABLE OF zmm_lab_offen,
     wa_lab_data  TYPE zmm_lab_offen.

If I select something I can see the table is filled.

Now, for my selection I need a temporary field more than my transparent table (zmm_lab_offen) has. So I tried to define a new TYPE including this table.


TYPES: BEGIN OF s_lab_data,
         struk TYPE zmm_lab_struktur,
         loekz TYPE boolean,
       END OF s_lab_data.
TYPES: tt_lab_data TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF s_lab_data WITH DEFAULT KEY.
DATA: it_lab_data TYPE tt_lab_data.

SELECT *
FROM  'inner join over 3 tables'
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_lab_data
WHERE ...

But this doesn't work. The Selection even imports 1600 rows but all fields are empty or has the value '0'!

What am I doing wrong??? I 've got the TYPES definition by the "ABAP Objects" book...

Regards,

Steffen

Re: wrong TYPES definition?

seshatalpasai_madala — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:34:34 GMT

Hi,

Use the following.

TYPES: BEGIN OF s_lab_data.

INCLUDE structur zmm_lab_struktur.

TYPES: loekz TYPE boolean,

END OF s_lab_data.

Regards,

Sesh

Message was edited by:

Seshatalpasai Madala

Re: wrong TYPES definition?

former_member183924 — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:38:24 GMT

can't be used in OO context --> generates an error

In the keywordmanual it is recommend to use

DATA: BEGIN OF rec, 
        ... 
        rec LIKE s, 
        ... 
      END OF rec.

instead of


DATA: BEGIN OF rec, 
        ... . 
        INCLUDE STRUCTURE s. 
DATA:   ... 
      END OF rec.

but this also don't work for me. LIKE and STRUCTURE cannot be used in methods. I have to use TYPE...

regards,

steffen

Re: wrong TYPES definition?

Former Member — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:39:23 GMT

Re: wrong TYPES definition?

seshatalpasai_madala — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:41:45 GMT

HI,

Then only way out is either declare it as a DDIC table type or inlcude it in type group and use that type group for your class.

Regards,

Sesh

Re: wrong TYPES definition?

former_member183924 — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:43:59 GMT

ok I already thought like this. But a temporary way would be much smoother..

THanks,

Regards

steffen