<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: why  UNICODE in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-unicode/m-p/1904472#M377201</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unicode simplifies data exchange between systems and increases the offering of scripts and languages. A series of Unicode-enabled SAP applications is now available and existing SAP systems can be converted to Unicode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Computers process and save each character, for example a &amp;#147;B&amp;#148;, as a byte sequence. The characters and byte strings are defined in a code page. The diversity of languages and writing systems means that numerous code pages are required. What&amp;#146;s more, the same character is mapped in different ways depending on the operating system or make of printer. Consequently, there are currently 390 code pages defined in the SAP system in order to support 41 different languages. Multiple, largely redundant code pages make data exchange more difficult and prevent integration. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Technologies based on Unicode do not have this problem. Unicode maps the characters of all the world&amp;#146;s scripts in a standardized form, thereby ensuring smooth communication between different languages and systems. Some 98,000 characters have already been defined in Unicode and space for more than one million characters is available. Using Unicode offers numerous advantages:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many different languages can be supported more easily than ever before&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is always a risk of data being lost if Unicode is not used &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tight integration with other Unicode-based technologies such as XML, VB, JAVA and .NET is supported. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since a Unicode system uses only a single code page, the restrictions relating to systems with more than one code page (Multi-Display, Multi-Processing, MDMP) naturally do not apply. Every user can log on in English, for example, and enter any Unicode characters he or she chooses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;keerthi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 06:37:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-02-08T06:37:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>why  UNICODE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-unicode/m-p/1904471#M377200</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of the "5" non-neumeric types , the "4"  types C,N,D,T, are character types. Fields with these types are  known as character fields. Each position in one of these fields  takes up enough space for the code of one character.  Currently , ABAP ONLY WORKS  WITH SINGLE -BYTE CODES. However  adaptation to unicode is  underway where each character will occupy "2" to "4"  bytes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please could anyone explain the advantage of such a process?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 06:25:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-unicode/m-p/1904471#M377200</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-08T06:25:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why  UNICODE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-unicode/m-p/1904472#M377201</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unicode simplifies data exchange between systems and increases the offering of scripts and languages. A series of Unicode-enabled SAP applications is now available and existing SAP systems can be converted to Unicode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Computers process and save each character, for example a &amp;#147;B&amp;#148;, as a byte sequence. The characters and byte strings are defined in a code page. The diversity of languages and writing systems means that numerous code pages are required. What&amp;#146;s more, the same character is mapped in different ways depending on the operating system or make of printer. Consequently, there are currently 390 code pages defined in the SAP system in order to support 41 different languages. Multiple, largely redundant code pages make data exchange more difficult and prevent integration. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Technologies based on Unicode do not have this problem. Unicode maps the characters of all the world&amp;#146;s scripts in a standardized form, thereby ensuring smooth communication between different languages and systems. Some 98,000 characters have already been defined in Unicode and space for more than one million characters is available. Using Unicode offers numerous advantages:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many different languages can be supported more easily than ever before&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is always a risk of data being lost if Unicode is not used &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tight integration with other Unicode-based technologies such as XML, VB, JAVA and .NET is supported. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since a Unicode system uses only a single code page, the restrictions relating to systems with more than one code page (Multi-Display, Multi-Processing, MDMP) naturally do not apply. Every user can log on in English, for example, and enter any Unicode characters he or she chooses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;keerthi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 06:37:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-unicode/m-p/1904472#M377201</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-08T06:37:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why  UNICODE</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-unicode/m-p/1904473#M377202</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;         Disadvantages of old standard code pages.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Each covers only a subset of all characters used&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Incompatibilities between different codepages&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Only restricted data exchange possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Too many of them&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With Unicode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And languages can be supported easily without the need for new code pages or other new methods&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UTF-16 &amp;#150; Unicode Transformation Format, 16 bit encoding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Fixed length, 1 character = 2 bytes (surrogate pairs = 2 + 2 bytes)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Platform-dependent byte order (big/little endian)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  2 byte alignment restriction&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UTF-8 &amp;#150; Unicode Transformation Format, 8 bit encoding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Variable length, 1 character = 1...4 bytes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Platform independent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  no alignment restriction&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  7 bit US ASCII compatible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  With Unicode, you can use multiple languages simultaneously at a single&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;frontend computer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   Unicode is required for cross-application data exchange without loss of data due&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to incompatible character sets. One way to present documents in the World&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wide Web (www) is XML, for example.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please reward if useful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 06:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/why-unicode/m-p/1904473#M377202</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-08T06:37:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

