<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Port, Message type and Function Group in Application Development and Automation Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/port-message-type-and-function-group/m-p/1891648#M373170</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &amp;lt;b&amp;gt; If the functionality is same , you can use the same function Group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If functionality is different , you want to use different Function Group. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Obvisouly, it is suggested to use different Message types . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are using same fields ,you can use the same idoc type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;depends on the scenior , the process code is needed. Generally no need.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Manju&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-08T12:27:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Port, Message type and Function Group</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/port-message-type-and-function-group/m-p/1891647#M373169</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hai,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Iam working on an inbound process for four different Partners.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any need of Port for Inbound?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shall i use the same message type and Idoc type?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And what about the function Group?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Avi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:19:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/port-message-type-and-function-group/m-p/1891647#M373169</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-08T12:19:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Port, Message type and Function Group</title>
      <link>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/port-message-type-and-function-group/m-p/1891648#M373170</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &amp;lt;b&amp;gt; If the functionality is same , you can use the same function Group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If functionality is different , you want to use different Function Group. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Obvisouly, it is suggested to use different Message types . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are using same fields ,you can use the same idoc type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;depends on the scenior , the process code is needed. Generally no need.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Manju&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sap.com/t5/application-development-and-automation-discussions/port-message-type-and-function-group/m-p/1891648#M373170</guid>
      <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-08T12:27:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

